Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-09 Thread Mike Alexander
--On December 9, 2010 10:24:51 AM -0800 John Ralls wrote: Anyway, if we're going to introduce the gnucash-version row, we should do it now, before 2.4 is released. It seems like this is a good idea, even if it is never used for automatic upgrades or fixups. At the very least it would help

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-09 Thread John Ralls
experimenting with new features or new storage modes, that they may have to go back to a stable-version-generated database and start over. I guess it's OK for an older version to load a newer-versioned database if it's read-only, though it might misinterpret the stored data and do somethi

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-09 Thread Derek Atkins
On Thu, December 9, 2010 12:01 pm, John Ralls wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> John Ralls writes: >> >> >>> Oh, and there isn't enough sql yet to have "bugs in the sql". >> >> The fact that we're having this discussion would prove this incorrect. >> There already has

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-09 Thread John Ralls
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Let's get 2.4 out the door first, and then we can talk about how we can > fix this in a piecemeal fashion. It would be nice if we could get > releases out approximately yearly. Can we come up with a > feature-set/timeline that would allow for

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-09 Thread John Ralls
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls writes: > > >> Oh, and there isn't enough sql yet to have "bugs in the sql". > > The fact that we're having this discussion would prove this incorrect. > There already has been a bug in the SQL causing the slots to not get > delete

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-09 Thread Derek Atkins
John Ralls writes: >> Maybe this is a silly question, but why couldn't we use the versions >> table to notice this, too? It's still a bug in the SQL, and we should >> get used to fixing SQL bugs internally. >> >> I understand it might take a few tries to get right, but that's what >> "mysqldump

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-08 Thread John Ralls
On Dec 8, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls writes: > >> On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:36 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote: >> >>> Support for this already exists. There's a "versions" table which has >>> table-name/table-version pairs. This is loaded automatically when the file >>> is >

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-08 Thread Derek Atkins
John Ralls writes: > On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:36 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote: > >> Support for this already exists. There's a "versions" table which has >> table-name/table-version pairs. This is loaded automatically when the file >> is >> opened. The backend code for each object type contains a "

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-08 Thread John Ralls
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:36 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote: > Support for this already exists. There's a "versions" table which has > table-name/table-version pairs. This is loaded automatically when the file > is > opened. The backend code for each object type contains a "create tables" > routine w

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-08 Thread John Ralls
On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:23 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John, > > John Ralls writes: > >> Everyone using a SQL backend who started with data saved from XML with a >> Gnucash version before 2.3.16 should re-save from XML with 2.3.17 and >> re-enter any intervening tra

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-08 Thread Phil Longstaff
o I took something for it. From: Derek Atkins To: John Ralls Cc: devel gnucash Sent: Wed, December 8, 2010 8:23:46 AM Subject: Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16 John, John Ralls writes: > Everyone using a SQL backend who started with data saved from XML with a &g

Re: SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-08 Thread Derek Atkins
John, John Ralls writes: > Everyone using a SQL backend who started with data saved from XML with a > Gnucash version before 2.3.16 should re-save from XML with 2.3.17 and > re-enter any intervening transactions. > > I just fixed 635967 [1], which complained that scheduled tran

SQL Databases from before 2.3.16

2010-12-07 Thread John Ralls
Everyone using a SQL backend who started with data saved from XML with a Gnucash version before 2.3.16 should re-save from XML with 2.3.17 and re-enter any intervening transactions. I just fixed 635967 [1], which complained that scheduled transactions didn't work in 2.3.17 from a dat

Re: Installing 2.3.16.dmg

2010-12-01 Thread John Ralls
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:09 PM, David T. wrote: > I am again hankering for some of the features in the development version of > Gnucash (currently at 2.3.17), and wanted to ask a few Mac-specific > questions... > > 1) The disk image includes a couple of introductory apps to help the > transition

Installing 2.3.16.dmg

2010-12-01 Thread David T.
I am again hankering for some of the features in the development version of Gnucash (currently at 2.3.17), and wanted to ask a few Mac-specific questions... 1) The disk image includes a couple of introductory apps to help the transition (UpdateDirs.app and FinanceQuote Update.app). I read the re

Re: gnucash-design.info missing from 2.3.16 tarball

2010-11-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 12. November 2010 schrieb David Reiser: > src/doc/design/gnucash-design.info has been included in the tarballs > through 2.3.15, but is not present in 2.3.16. The whole 'design' folder is > gone. Was that intentional? There are some messages during install that &g

gnucash-design.info missing from 2.3.16 tarball

2010-11-11 Thread David Reiser
src/doc/design/gnucash-design.info has been included in the tarballs through 2.3.15, but is not present in 2.3.16. The whole 'design' folder is gone. Was that intentional? There are some messages during install that suggest the file is still expected to be present. Dave -- David Re

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-09 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 6 November 2010, Yawar Amin wrote: > Hi Geert, > > On 2010-11-06, at 05:47, Geert Janssens wrote: > >> […] > > > > The other part the is not documented at all is the business functionality > > in GnuCash. But this has never been documented before, so there is no > > loss compared with

Re: Gnucash 2.3.16 (2.4.0 RC1) released

2010-11-08 Thread Mark Haanen
g freeze for a while, but there have been several small string changes. When can we expect to see 2.3.16 at the Translation Project to dot the remaining i's and cross the final t's? -- Mark Haanen ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-06 Thread Yawar Amin
Hi Geert, On 2010-11-06, at 05:47, Geert Janssens wrote: >> […] > The other part the is not documented at all is the business functionality in > GnuCash. But this has never been documented before, so there is no loss > compared with the previous versions if it remains undocumented. Personally,

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-06 Thread Mike Evans
On Saturday November 6 2010 09:47:59 Geert Janssens wrote: > On Saturday 6 November 2010, Yawar Amin wrote: > > Hi John & List, > > > > On 2010-11-05, at 14:33, John Ralls wrote: > > > […] > > > I think it should be a release candidate for 2.4, with a code freeze > > > for anything but critical bu

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-06 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 6 November 2010, Yawar Amin wrote: > Hi John & List, > > On 2010-11-05, at 14:33, John Ralls wrote: > > […] > > I think it should be a release candidate for 2.4, with a code freeze for > > anything but critical bugs. If it works as well as I think it will, then > > we can release 2.4 a

Re: 2.3.16 Few updates for Latvian

2010-11-06 Thread Cristian Marchi
Commited to rev. 19759 Thanks! Cristian Il 05/11/2010 22:28, Valdis Vītoliņš ha scritto: Hello! Please commit updated lv.po file before build. Thanks! Valdis Am Freitag, 5. November 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff: I think I can do 2.3.16 this weekend. That sounds very good

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-05 Thread Mike Alexander
--On November 6, 2010 12:25:12 AM -0400 Yawar Amin wrote: Hi John & List, On 2010-11-05, at 14:33, John Ralls wrote: […] I think it should be a release candidate for 2.4, with a code freeze for anything but critical bugs. If it works as well as I think it will, then we can release 2.4 as so

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-05 Thread Yawar Amin
Hi John & List, On 2010-11-05, at 14:33, John Ralls wrote: > […] > I think it should be a release candidate for 2.4, with a code freeze for > anything but critical bugs. If it works as well as I think it will, then we > can release 2.4 as soon as the documentation is ready. Are there any user-

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 5. November 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff: > I think I can do 2.3.16 this weekend. That sounds very good. Indeed a 2.3.16 is necessary. Thanks a lot! Christian ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.

Re: 2.3.16

2010-11-05 Thread Phil Longstaff
I think I can do 2.3.16 this weekend. Phil - I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it. From: John Ralls To: Gnucash Devel Sent: Fri, November 5, 2010 2:33:28 PM Subject: 2.3.16 It's been 2 months since 2.3.1

2.3.16

2010-11-05 Thread John Ralls
It's been 2 months since 2.3.15 and we've made some pretty major improvements. I think it's time to do a release. I think it should be a release candidate for 2.4, with a code freeze for anything but critical bugs. If it works as well as I think it will, then we can release 2.4 as soon as the d