Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-30 Thread Peter C. Norton
Yeah, 1.3 is a pretty lackluster guile. And that's saying something :) -Peter On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:08:31PM +, Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote: > Rob Browning wrote: > > > As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap works fine with > > guile 1.3.4 and g

Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-30 Thread Peter C. Norton
> I seem to recall that there was some ugliness with 1.3 anyway, and > > that the guile people would really prefer people use 1.3.4. I can't > > remember what the issue was, though... > > The issue is that Redhat 6.x uses guile-1.3. That means if there are > any other

Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-18 Thread Richard -Gilligan- Uschold
Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote: I'm using guile 1.3, only because the rpm I downloaded for 1.4.4 required it.  I thought it odd that it wasn't using a more recent version.  I'll upgrade to 1.4.7 to see if that solves the problem.   I downloaded gnucash-1.4.7-2mdk.i586.rpm and ir requires guile-

Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The issue is that Redhat 6.x uses guile-1.3. That means if there are > any other programs which link to guile, upgrading to guile-1.3.4 will > be a pain because the library major version # changed and those other > programs will brea

Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-18 Thread Dave Peticolas
4.7 to see if that solves the problem. > > I seem to recall that there was some ugliness with 1.3 anyway, and > that the guile people would really prefer people use 1.3.4. I can't > remember what the issue was, though... The issue is that Redhat 6.x uses guile-1.3. That means if

Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
to recall that there was some ugliness with 1.3 anyway, and that the guile people would really prefer people use 1.3.4. I can't remember what the issue was, though... Thanks for the info. -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Re: How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-18 Thread Richard -Gilligan- Uschold
Rob Browning wrote: As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap works fine with guile 1.3.4 and guile 1.4 on my system(s). Since it would be somewhat difficult/time-consuming for me to install guile-1.3 and add backward compatibility and test g-wrap, I'm trying to figure out if it

How many people are using guile 1.3 (not 1.3.4) and can't easily switch?

2000-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap works fine with guile 1.3.4 and guile 1.4 on my system(s). Since it would be somewhat difficult/time-consuming for me to install guile-1.3 and add backward compatibility and test g-wrap, I'm trying to figure out if it would be unreasonab

Re: Gnucash 1.3.4 import errors

2000-03-27 Thread Bill Gribble
"Ralph F. De Witt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just downloaded 1.3.4 to test the repaired qif import routine. My > first problem was that it would not identify my date format in auto. That's to be expected on some short files. If the only dates look like 2/3/00, w

Gnucash 1.3.4 import errors

2000-03-27 Thread Ralph F. De Witt
I just downloaded 1.3.4 to test the repaired qif import routine. My first problem was that it would not identify my date format in auto. The date format is MM/DD/. When manually selected it loaded the qif file. The second problem was that it duplicated all the transactions. One transaction

Re: 1.3.4

2000-03-27 Thread Jeremy Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It's been rumoured that LE NY Yannick said: > > > > Hello Jeremy, > > > > Why gnucash-1.3.4 is not at http://www.gnucash.org/pub/gnucash? > > actually, all of the subdirectories save one (sources) are dead > at this URL.

Re: 1.3.4

2000-03-27 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that LE NY Yannick said: > > Hello Jeremy, > > Why gnucash-1.3.4 is not at http://www.gnucash.org/pub/gnucash? actually, all of the subdirectories save one (sources) are dead at this URL. And that one has only the old 1.2.5 source on it. --linas -- Gn

Re: 1.3.4

2000-03-27 Thread Jeremy Collins
Oh crap.. I keep forgetting that the web, and ftp servers on different servers. I'll update this stuff in a bit... Thanks for letting me know. -- Jeremy Collins LinuxMall.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] LE NY Yannick wrote: > > Hello Jeremy, > > Why gnucash-1.3.4 is not at http:

Re: 1.3.4

2000-03-27 Thread LE NY Yannick
Hello Jeremy, Why gnucash-1.3.4 is not at http://www.gnucash.org/pub/gnucash? Can you store it at this location if ftp site have a problem? Do you made the update habitually on the gnucash's website? There is no update since the 13th March 2000. Yannick Jeremy Collins a écrit : > O

Re: 1.3.4

2000-03-27 Thread Jeremy Collins
Ok, 1.3.4 is now available on the ftp server! -- Jeremy Collins LinuxMall.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave Peticolas wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, there is a new release. > > Here are some of the changes from 1.3.3: > > o alpha code for check printing (requires gnome-print) > o