Thank you.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:59 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> David,
>
> No, the status is actually "RESOLVED" and comes with a bunch of
> resolutions like "FIXED", "WONTFIX", "NOTGNUCASH", and "NOTABUG".
>
> There's also a little-used status, "VERIFIED", that's intended to be set
> after so
David,
No, the status is actually "RESOLVED" and comes with a bunch of resolutions
like "FIXED", "WONTFIX", "NOTGNUCASH", and "NOTABUG".
There's also a little-used status, "VERIFIED", that's intended to be set after
someone has checked that the "FIXED" resolution really is.
Regards,
John Ralls
I just did not mention all the others. I was not sure about that one
because it looked like it should have been closed, but it looked like it
wasn't, and I thought that closed bugs might not be migrated. Not sure
about that, though. So there is not a status called Closed?
David C
On Sat, Jun 3
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:54 PM, David Carlson
> wrote:
>
> I am not sure if this is supposed to happen this way or not, so I will
> simply let you know about this observation.
>
> I received a notice that https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598788
> had been migrated. That bug was resol
I am not sure if this is supposed to happen this way or not, so I will
simply let you know about this observation.
I received a notice that https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598788
had been migrated. That bug was resolved about 5 years ago for release 2.6
but apparently not closed. Since
