On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Conrad Canterford
wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 18:37 +, Mike Evans wrote:
>> On Sunday February 21 2010 17:22:59 Donald Allen wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM, wrote:
>> > > A question for you folks --
>> > > Does anyone know how far back a data
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 18:37 +, Mike Evans wrote:
> On Sunday February 21 2010 17:22:59 Donald Allen wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM, wrote:
> > > A question for you folks --
> > > Does anyone know how far back a data file must go before the SQL
> > > interface starts truncating dat
On Sunday February 21 2010 17:22:59 Donald Allen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM, wrote:
> > A question for you folks --
> >
> > Does anyone know how far back a data file must go before the SQL
> > interface starts truncating data?
>
> This sort of implies that the cause of this problem
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM, wrote:
> A question for you folks --
>
> Does anyone know how far back a data file must go before the SQL interface
> starts truncating data?
This sort of implies that the cause of this problem is "how far back"
the data file goes. We don't know that-- we don't k
A question for you folks --
Does anyone know how far back a data file must go before the SQL interface
starts truncating data? Is this bug specific to Donald's dataset, or has
anyone else seen this? I've got data just for 2009-10, and I'm not seeing
any truncation or spurious amounts (so far, an
Geert wrote:
Aside from the bug you are trying to analyse...
You can try to add a new account window (which is not the same as creating a
new book), via menu View->New Accounts Page.
If this shows your existing account data, there is another bug in 2.3.10
regarding the accounts page not showing
On Friday 19 February 2010, Donald Allen wrote:
> Phil --
>
> As I promised in my email to you yesterday, I tried 2.3.10 this
> morning, since my previous testing that led to filing the bug report
> (609583) we've been discussing (and one other) was with 2.3.8.
>
> As with 2.3.8, I built 2.3.10 f
Phil --
As I promised in my email to you yesterday, I tried 2.3.10 this
morning, since my previous testing that led to filing the bug report
(609583) we've been discussing (and one other) was with 2.3.8.
As with 2.3.8, I built 2.3.10 from source (I'm running this on an Arch
Linux system with 2.2.