Christian Stimming wrote:
> Agreed - a binary/distro package doesn't need gnucash.pot and neither
> any other source code or .po files.
Ah, OK. I was confused. AFAICT the gnucash.pot is in the DIST variable
(as $(DOMAIN).pot) and certainly the tarball.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Vie
...)
Just courious, which one is 'the new hbci library'?
Kind regards
Thomas
--
Thomas Viehmann, <http://thomas.viehmann.net/>
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
ult, but at some point
it struck me as odd that the guile bindings try to load the lib*.so
links instead of the lib*.so.X.
Cheers
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, <http://thomas.viehmann.net/>
pgp5EwtLfTgC1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
gnucash-dev
ensuring consitency of data and immediate availabilty of
changes in the data. And the latter is (for purposes of the more common
gconf installations) the benefit over plain dotfiles.
Cheers
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, <http://thomas.viehmann.net/>
pgpyg6HSyf8h4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Derek Atkins wrote:
> See, this is absolutely a requirement, IMHO. If gconf2 doesn't let us
> do this then, IMHO, we CANNOT use gconf2. I consider it a
> show-stopper if you tie a user's gnucash configuration to a single
> machine. I'd rather keep the existing scheme-based configuration than
> l
James A. Treacy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:01:23PM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > I think that's because gnucash is compiled without a libktoblzcheck-de
> > build-dependency.
>
> This is the first I've heard of this library a
Hi.
C. Gatzemeier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I found gnucash-hbci didn't work though, upon invoking a HBCI action a warning
> came up:
Yeah, I don't think anyone knows the reason yet, though.
> Also gnucash-hbci's account and bank ID and checksum calculation seems not to
> work even though I ins
