Le dimanche 28 septembre 2014 à 12:53 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
> On Sep 28, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > Le dimanche 28 septembre 2014 à 12:21 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
> >> On Sep 28, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Sébastien Villemot
> >> wro
Le dimanche 28 septembre 2014 à 12:21 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
> On Sep 28, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > Le dimanche 28 septembre 2014 à 10:04 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
> >> On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Sébastien Villemot
> >> wro
Le dimanche 28 septembre 2014 à 10:04 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
> On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > Le dimanche 28 septembre 2014 à 11:34 -0500, Tommy Trussell a écrit :
> >> I just noticed GnuCash 2.6.4 has been uploaded to Debian Unstable, bu
s getting close and I did not want to miss the
deadline.
I guess the release announcement is currently being prepared.
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
signature.asc
Des
Le lundi 17 février 2014 à 19:51 +0100, Geert Janssens a écrit :
> Out of curiosity: is the pc file a new addition in libdbi 0.9 ?
Yes, at least in Debian.
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`-
Le lundi 17 février 2014 à 19:16 +0100, Geert Janssens a écrit :
> On Sunday 09 February 2014 16:16:10 Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > With the upload of DBD 0.9 to Debian unstable, the location of the DBD
> > modules has changed. This causes failures to compile GnuCash. The
> >
With the upload of DBD 0.9 to Debian unstable, the location of the DBD
modules has changed. This causes failures to compile GnuCash. The
attached patch fixes this.
Thanks,
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebasti
it is not
source code. The solution implemented by the patch is simply to add
jquery.js to the tarball.
Thanks for considering (if possible for the 2.6.1 release!),
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`-
Le samedi 11 janvier 2014 à 15:46 -0800, John Ralls a écrit :
> On Jan 11, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > Concerning the time_t issue, I could carry a Debian-specific patch if
> > that change was not modifying the ABI (but I guess it does on 32-bit
> > arc
uess it does on 32-bit
archs). And anyways that would not fix the issue for other GNU/Linux
distributions. I could however add my voice to convince libdbi
developers. Is there a bug report to track this issue?
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' h
then our security team would have to analyse and possibly fix
two packages instead of one, hence double workload.
The fact that GnuCash already has embedded copies of libqof and the
gnumeric register is not a good reason to add more embedded copies :)
--
.''`.Sébastien Vi
ds on it. That leaves you with the problem
of compiling your own binaries of the library in the meantime, but that
should only concern developers, and those should be able to compile the
library from source.
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `'
not sure I will be able to
complete the work alone.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnuca
Please find attached a small patch that fixes an inconsistency in clean
rules. It applies to the current development branch.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Descri
John Ralls writes:
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 3:37 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
>> John Ralls writes:
>>
>>> On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:54 PM, Geert Janssens
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have updated the release schedule on the wiki
>>&
ze, and will therefore ship GnuCash
2.4 (even if GC 2.6 is released soon).
Best,
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
pgpVkMQmrVO51.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
that be ok for packagers ? I have no idea. If so, that would be an easy
> solution indeed.
That would be ok for Debian. Symlinks are supported in dpkg, and we
don't use the uninstall rule.
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :
17 matches
Mail list logo