On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:51:50AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You'd be better off creating a stored-procedure-based interface and
> > having it enforce the semantics.
>
> Except not all DBs that we
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:33:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> the list of requirements. Also, I dont think we can depend on stored
> procedures; SQLite doesn't support them.
Dumb question... why would someone want to run SQLite over the existing
storage mechanism?
--
Jim C. Nasb
, 7427, 4919, 13301, 18917 and probably more).
See also http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where
ks and
> enforces certain integrity) from application tier (single point) to DB
> backend tier (potentially many different implementations for different
> backends).
You'd be better off creating a stored-procedure-based interface and
having it enforce the semantics.
--
Jim
that I'm biased or anything
> ;)
Actually, at least in PostgreSQL, bytea is human readable when you
select on it:
decibel=# create table b(b bytea);
CREATE TABLE
decibel=# insert into b values('01234456789ABCDEF');
INSERT 0 1
decibel=# select * from b;
b
