Hi,
As one of the goffice developers, I'm keeping an eye on the gnucash list.
But you should try to discuss directly with us when some feature are
missing in goffice for the gnucash use.
There isn't any goffice mailing list, but you can use the gnumeric one.
Or try to reach jean, jody, gmorten
Le dimanche 16 octobre 2005 à 10:40 +0100, Neil Williams a écrit :
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 12:22 am, Josh Sled wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 00:13 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > I have no knowledge of scheme and despite many appeals from Derek and
> > > others, I have absolutely no inte
Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 à 20:50 -0400, Josh Sled a écrit :
> On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:46 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> > One area in particular that is new and unknown is the graphing support.
> > I've just gotten it working again, and it would be useful to get the
> > widest basic test of this cod
Hi,
Please ignore previous post, sent by an unintentional CTR+Enter.
Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 à 20:50 -0400, Josh Sled a écrit :
> On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:46 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> > One area in particular that is new and unknown is the graphing support.
> > I've just gotten it working aga
Hi,
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2005 à 15:17 +0200, Christian Stimming a
écrit :
>I would advice against -Wno-error but rather switching off those
> particular warnings as described above. OTOH of course goffice
shouldn't
> be fixed by us but rather by upstream.
>
AFAIK, gnucash2 currently use an
Hi,
Imminence of gnucash-gnome2-dev merge into HEAD is very good news...
>Quoting David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 19:57 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
>> > By the way, I'm all up for this merge back into HEAD at any time now.
>>
>> Works for me.
>
>Once we've got G
