On Wednesday 16 February 2005 20:05, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem on mips is a trivial one: gnucash works on mips, it's a
> > minor build system problem that prevents it.
>
> If it's truly a minor build system problem then a "minor" patch to
> Well, either the matching algorithm needs to get much, much better, or
> there needs to be a way to manually match transactions...
The algrithm is actaully very good in most cases. Apparently you've hit a
corner case as well as a bug caused by lack of sync between developers (and
my general l
> Unfortunately, OFX import clobbers the Notes field.
>
> Nothing is replaced; it is just emptied.
That's not supposed to happen. File a bug report.
--
Benoit Grégoire, http://benoitg.coeus.ca/
pgpY7dIKDXrdN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
gnucash
On Monday 15 November 2004 05:41 pm, Harm Verhagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My bank (Rabobank, dutch) exports its data as comma separated text
> files.
> I'd like to import this into gnucash. For this I need to convert the
> data to the OFX format.
>
> I cannot image that something like this wasn't already
On October 26, 2004 11:04 am, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> are there any news about the release planning? I would like to ask about
> a specific date for 1.8.10... Would November 14th be somehow good...?
I comited all that I intended to commit (except for some translation work in
my in
On September 30, 2004 08:50 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Actually, a few of us were already discussing this on IRC about 2-4
> weeks ago and seemed to agree that we should release a 1.8.10 sometime
> around the end of October-Mid November-ish. I'll let Chris Lyttle
> decide on an actual date based on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 September 2004 07:33 am, Nils Kalchhauser wrote:
> Hey!
>
> I was using Gnucash a little (before I was going on travels..) and really
> liked it. I'm interested in IFX support in addition to OFX as that is the
> one my bank offers. Is de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 August 2004 06:57 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Benoit Grégoire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Well, since I was told at the time not to use the engine's revert
> >> > function, there isn't much choice is there...
> >>
> >> What "engine'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > Well, since I was told at the time not to use the engine's revert
> > function, there isn't much choice is there...
>
> What "engine's revert function"?
xaccTransRollbackEdit()
> But yes, there is a choice -- you could do what the QIF importer do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 August 2004 05:18 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Milind Kamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am sorry. That was a false alarm.
> > The buttons work correctly.
> > The reason I was thrown off was because when the
> > "Generic import transa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 01 August 2004 10:35 pm, blfs wrote:
> So the question becomes why is it so hard to import
> and export a check register? Are there similar problems
> with importing and exporting Customer lists, vendor
> lists, bills and invoices, etc, etc?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 03 July 2004 11:52 am, S2 wrote:
> Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Your best bet if you want to do this quickly is to create a QIF or OFX
> > file of your transactions and use the GnuCash QIF or OFX importers.
>
> Thanks Derek.
> Could someone tell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Can someone make me a project admin on the sourceforge gnucash
> page? I've discovered I cannot view the donated amounts;
> I'd like to prepare a mini-balance sheet, for inclusion on
> the donations page. I'm not sure if its time yet to figure
> out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > > * It would not distinguish between inflows and outflows, but combine
> > > them. Inflows would be positive numbers and outflows negative.
> >
> > But that's what it IS doing.. Are you saying that if you have $10
> > going into an account and th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 01:00 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> No, 2.4 is NOT part of FC1:
>
> ls gtk2*
> gtk2-2.2.4-5.1.i386.rpm
> gtk2-devel-2.2.4-5.1.i386.rpm
> gtk2-engines-2.2.0-3.i386.rpm
Err, gtk2-2.2.4 IS part of gnome 2.4, gtk2-2.4.0 was only just re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 11:09 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I'll repeat my statement again: We should LAG gnome releases by AT
> LEAST 6-9 months... Minimum. And indeed we should pick a "base
> distro" (I'd argue FC1 at this point) and make sure our code
Greetings everyone,
A month ago I sent a message to indicate that I was planing on working on OFX
support a my end of degree project.
I am happy to announce that my project has been accepted, and that work is
coming along quickly.
My project has changed somewhat from it's initial form. Devel
17 matches
Mail list logo
