On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 16:43 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Saturday 14 March 2009, Tynan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I don't really know anything about open source, but I've been enjoying
> > using GnuCash, and I thought I'd try to help out by making a new splash
> > screen graphic. I have attach
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 19:25 -0800, Alexander Sotirov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:02:59PM +0100, Andreas K?hler wrote:
> > As you can see the GnuCash 2.2.4 release announcement contained
> md5sums
> > and was signed with my private gpg key. I hope that is better than
> > before.
>
Sorry
Sorry to be a pest, but why aren't there any gpg signatures for at least
SHA1sums published for the tarballs for the recent 2.2.x series? Is it
just an oversight?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.g
Hi,
A bit delayed, but I wanted to say thanks for the the new sx code. Dealing
with the list is much simpler now with the combination of
inst_model = gnc_sx_get_current_instances();
gnc_sx_instance_model_summarize(inst_model, &summary);
My custom feature of a pending sx tool button th
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, Andrew. This sounds like a useful feature. I
> couldn't tell from your email whether you wanted feedback on whipping
> the patch into shape for inclusion, or you were just offering it up
> for the interest of whoever might find it.
>
Mostly the l
Hi,
After reading a recent thread, I thought I might post this.
Basically I felt that the way the scheduled transactions/reminders were
presented didn't really meet my needs, either to be greeted with a
scheduled transaction druid or having to select a menu item to launch the
druid to see if
Commenting out the following line in the spec file makes the build go to
the end:
#%{_datadir}/xml/qsf/*
I still get non fatal warnings though:
warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/xml/gnucash/xsl/README
/usr/share/xml/gnucash/xsl/date-time.xsl
/usr/share/
Josh Sled wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 19:41 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
Josh Sled wrote:
Oh, what're you thinking? I'm planning on re-writing most of the SX
stuff in the next month or two, so we might want to coordinate now,
before things diverge too much...
Basically I was t
Josh Sled wrote:
Oh, what're you thinking? I'm planning on re-writing most of the SX
stuff in the next month or two, so we might want to coordinate now,
before things diverge too much...
Basically I was thinking of checking every new tx as it goes into (by
entry) a register against a book-l
Josh Sled wrote:
That's right. There's a final page in the since-last-run dialog
prompting you to delete SXes that are "obsolete" or "dead".
I'm thinking that page and functionality is going to go away in a future
SX cleanup, though.
Thanks, I'll have to watch out for that then,
I've be
Hi,
If someone knows off the top of his head, what the "dead list" is WRT
scheduled transaction, it would help me out a lot.
The reminders and "to_create_list" seem to be pretty easy to grasp, but
right now the best I can tell the dead list is maybe for those scheduled
txn that are past the
Derek Atkins wrote:
> How about icons for "Post Invoice" and "Unpost Invoice"?
> (I'm not sure what else we need from the business features section)
>
> -derek
>
Attached is a first go at that. The reason for including the "Business
Account" and "Invoice" was to show sort of the development o
Hi,
Derek Atkins wrote:
I'm just not sure we need it... I know we need a few new icons.
You still need icons? The bugzilla
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327647) entry was closed +30
days ago saying you're all good with icons. So what icons do you have in
mind?
Andrew
P.
Hi,
Christian Stimming wrote:
Hi,
the fundamental decision here has been debated by several developers here
several times. BUT:
Sorry - I don't want you all to revisit that again!
*Today* I guess your problem is simply that sourceforge's *anonymous* CVS has
unexpected problems. Their sit
Hi,
Which is the real source for getting QOF? As recently as 20 minutes ago the
svn of gnucash had a way more up-to-date QOF than a cvs checkout from
QOF's sourceforge cvs.
Should I bother with the QOF sourceforge cvs or not? Any recommendations?
Andrew
Hi,
I noticed this last week, and finally decided to hunt it down.
Looks like as of
r13549 gnucash/trunk/src/backend/postgres/checkpoint.c
36 +#include "config.h"
37 +
I need to configure with --enable-deprecated-glib or building postres
backend on FC5 (RAWHIDE) is broken
Derek Atkins wrote:
I suspect the issue is that those functions, acc_free, commit_err,
on_done, noop, and on_err are being defined "static inline" and your
particular compiler is complaining about them. FWIW I can build
r13513 on FC4 without any issue.
FWIW, r13513 builds without error on m
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 08:13:59AM -0500, Andrew Duggan wrote:
Christian Stimming wrote:
Just a quick information: r13471 hangs when I do a quickfill transaction
in the register. This problem didn't occur with my last build which was
r13444,
This does not occ
Christian Stimming wrote:
Just a quick information: r13471 hangs when I do a quickfill transaction in
the register. This problem didn't occur with my last build which was r13444,
This does not occur in r13453 built Friday 3/3.
Building r13471 now.
___
Hi,
Ben Stanley wrote:
Hi,
When I try to build svn version r13359 on Ubuntu 5.10, I get the
following error:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
gnc-lot.c: In function 'gnc_lot_set_title':
gnc-lot.c:174: warning: implicit declaration of function
'qof_instance_mark_dirty'
make[5]: *** [gnc-lo
David Hampton wrote:
[...]
This means to disable installing the default key/value pairs
into /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults with the install-data-local makefile
rule.
Both the schema and default value steps should occur when compiling and
installing directly from source. When compiling to ins
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, lots of snow (and shoveling) yesterday...
Mark Johnson wrote:
[...]
I assumed that I was supposed to replace %{_sysconfdir} with
/opt/gnucash-svn13206/etc.
This has stopped gnucash from prompting for the defaults at every start.
Cool..
Was this supposed to cre
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Andrew Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Any help as to where I might get that tarball? The one I found at
http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.6.tar.gz
does not have a configure.in file.
Sorry, configure.ac -- same thing. "confi
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Dave Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
FYI - I was not able to locate a configure.in in the g-wrap-1.9
directory tree - hence why I tries the glib-devel install.
Um, it's in the top-level of the g-wrap 1.9.6 tarball right next to
the configure script.
David Hampton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:50 -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
Did you rerun configure after updating? What arguments?
After updating, I do a make distclean, autogen.sh, and a configure.
./configure --enable-opt-style-install --prefix=/opt/gnucash-svn$rev
--enable-debug --e
Mike Alexander wrote:
If you try to build gnucash in a directory other than the source
directory you get a couple of build errors. If you try to run from that
directory, it doesn't work quite right either. It is probably better to
use an lndir directory for building, but if you don't want t
David Hampton wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 23:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) in src/engine/gw-engine.c (which it appears may actually be generated at some
point from scheme code?), a variable was passed an an argument to a function
before being initialized, so I simply initialized it t
Chris Lyttle wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 00:58 -0500, Andrew Duggan wrote:
As for the new and delete account icons what do you think about just a
green "+" on top of the account instead of the yellow blob, and a red "X"
in the lower right for the delete?
I attached to
From: Derek Atkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Would you rather be able to always read a data file created in a new
>version of gnucash using an older version of gnucash, where saving that
>data file will lose data when you re-open it in the new version, or would
>you rather the
Hi,
Derek Atkins wrote:
Thanks. This has been fixed. I also noticed that HBCI had a similar
problem. I've fixed that, too. Please continue testing from r13076.
Confirmed -- I updated to 13083 last night and it worked great. I built
rpms from a make distcheck tarball. FWIW it builds and
Hi,
Chris Lyttle wrote:
First, thanks for your work on this Andrew, new icons were badly needed.
My comments;
I like the transfer, open, trash and account icons. The ones I dont
really like are the close and split icons. Close I would rather just a
simple 'x' in black rather than the reversed bu
the Tango Project
(http://tango-project.org). The transfer icon is really based entirely on
the Tango Project (http://tango-project.org) send-receive icon (minus the
envelope)
Andrew
Thanks,
Dan W.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:45:14PM -0500, Andrew Duggan wrote:
Hi,
Josh Sled wrote:
On Thu,
Hi,
Josh Sled wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 14:52 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
Or use the existing http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327647
("New icons needed for 2.0").
Finally got the bz access straighted out, So I uploaded the one's I made
(split and account) and hacked (trans
Hi,
I made a split icon and a transfer funds icon (based on the Tango Project
icons). I wasn't sure if sending pngs to the list would be OK so I am
asking first. If you're interested let me know.
Thanks,
Andrew
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnuca
Hi,
I am getting a build failure from the tarball I make with a make distcheck
or dist. This is from 13074. If just tar up my entire local tree, and use
that as the rpmbuild source, it builds OK and produces a usable gnucash.
FWIW I am running this through an rpmbuild on FC4 plus updates (QO
35 matches
Mail list logo
