Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage

FYI, There is already a Flatpak and a Snap available, but it looks like both are still at 2.6.x https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.gnucash.GnuCash https://snapcraft.io/gnucash-jz I don’t see a size on the Flatpak, but the Snap is a tad under 111MB. Interestingly, the .dmg went from ≈112MB to

Re: [GNC-dev] AppImage

> On May 10, 2018, at 2:42 PM, cicko wrote: > > I just learned a bit more about application packages (AppImage, Snap, > Flatpak) on Linux after downloading KeePassXC image and find them quite > convenient. > Nabble does not find anything if I search for AppImage so I'd like to see > you opinio

[GNC-dev] AppImage

I just learned a bit more about application packages (AppImage, Snap, Flatpak) on Linux after downloading KeePassXC image and find them quite convenient. Nabble does not find anything if I search for AppImage so I'd like to see you opinion about using one of these for distributing Linux version of

Re: [GNC-dev] Bug 795653 - Windows File Open/Save Dialog

John, I think I downgraded gtk and ran gnucash from the install directory with no change. Did glib and when starting gnucash complained about pango. I did not rebuild gnucash after just doing gtk, I can check on that tomorrow if you would like. Bob On 10 May 2018 at 17:41, John Ralls wrote: >

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] Convincing my credit union to support online importing

Did you or they try the "add institution" link in the "OFX Home" box in the upper right corner? Regards, John Ralls > On May 10, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Jeff Albrecht wrote: > > The question dated 4/19/2018 was originally posted on gnucash-user I post > response to my own question here on gnucash

Re: [GNC-dev] [GNC] Convincing my credit union to support online importing

The question dated 4/19/2018 was originally posted on gnucash-user I post response to my own question here on gnucash-devel hoping to help my Credit Union learn how to appear in the OFX DirectConnect User Setup wizard. ... Very cool. I now have my GNUCash checking and savings accounts connected

Re: [GNC-dev] Bug 795653 - Windows File Open/Save Dialog

> On May 10, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Had a poke at this as I was certain that it was working in the 2.7.x series. > > It can be fixed by downgrading the following packages with pcman -U to... > > pacman -U > /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mingw-w64-i686-glib2-2.5

[GNC-dev] Bug 795653 - Windows File Open/Save Dialog

Had a poke at this as I was certain that it was working in the 2.7.x series. It can be fixed by downgrading the following packages with pcman -U to... pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mingw-w64-i686-glib2-2.54.3-1-any.pkg.tar.xz pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mingw-w64-i686-pango-1.40.11-1-any.pk

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

If it is not an Apache problem, one other consideration might be an .htaccess rule inserted there by BZ. Regards, Adrien > On May 10, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > Hi, > > BZ is Perl, so no recompiling needed. > Changing that parameter is not sufficient. Indeed, when I was testi

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

Hi, BZ is Perl, so no recompiling needed. Changing that parameter is not sufficient. Indeed, when I was testing it was set without the added /bugzilla. I think the issue is an Apache configuration issue. -derek On Thu, May 10, 2018 11:10 am, Adrien Monteleone wrote: > Does setting ‘Administrati

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

Does setting ‘Administration > Parameters > urlbase' to simply “https://bugzilla.gnucash.org/” not do the trick? Regards, Adrien > On May 10, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 10:43 am, John Ralls wrote: >> >>> The extra /bugzilla does seem superfluous to me.

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

I would think that’s a permalink type setting. BZ is writing that in because it’s specified. I’d be shocked (and saddened a little) to discover it was hard coded. (editable of course, but then you’d have to recompile BZ!) Regards, Adrien > On May 10, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > >

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

I like the idea to either use a sub-domain OR a sub-folder, but not both. (for the same purpose) I suppose to stay consistent with other practices on gnucash.org, stick with the sub-domain. My usual rule is that if you are providing something that is running a separate process from the webserv

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

On Thu, May 10, 2018 10:43 am, John Ralls wrote: > >> The extra /bugzilla does seem superfluous to me. > > On the face of it, yeah, especially since you’ve made the effort to create > a “bugzilla.gnucash.org ” vhost. > > OTOH, it’s pretty rare to type out a URI these

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

> On May 10, 2018, at 2:52 AM, Mike Evans wrote: > > On Thu, 10 May 2018 05:37:31 -0400 > "Derek Atkins" mailto:de...@ihtfp.com>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As you are aware, we are looking at migrating from gnome bugzilla to our >> own instance because gnome is shutting their BZ off. I've been w

Re: [GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

On Thu, 10 May 2018 05:37:31 -0400 "Derek Atkins" wrote: > Hi, > > As you are aware, we are looking at migrating from gnome bugzilla to our > own instance because gnome is shutting their BZ off. I've been working on > migrating the data, and have what I think is a good migration process in > pl

[GNC-dev] GnuCash Bugzilla URLs -- /bugzilla or not?

Hi, As you are aware, we are looking at migrating from gnome bugzilla to our own instance because gnome is shutting their BZ off. I've been working on migrating the data, and have what I think is a good migration process in place. We are at the early stages of testing the migration, but I wanted