Re: Invoice/Bill structure

2018-01-11 Thread Derek Atkins
They are both used if you use chargebacks. -derek On Thu, January 11, 2018 12:55 pm, R. Victor Klassen wrote: > I’ve been poking around in the SQL for invoices/bills, and > > Inquiring mind(s) wish to know: > > Why, in an “Entry” is there both an invoice (text) and a bill (text) > field, only on

Re: Invoice/Bill structure

2018-01-11 Thread R. Victor Klassen
Curiosity satisfied. Thanks. > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 11 januari 2018 18:55:46 CET schreef R. Victor Klassen: >> I’ve been poking around in the SQL for invoices/bills, and >> >> Inquiring mind(s) wish to know: >> >> Why, in an “Entry” is there b

Re: Invoice/Bill structure

2018-01-11 Thread Geert Janssens
Op donderdag 11 januari 2018 18:55:46 CET schreef R. Victor Klassen: > I’ve been poking around in the SQL for invoices/bills, and > > Inquiring mind(s) wish to know: > > Why, in an “Entry” is there both an invoice (text) and a bill (text) field, > only one of which is ever used, and i_price_num/d

Invoice/Bill structure

2018-01-11 Thread R. Victor Klassen
I’ve been poking around in the SQL for invoices/bills, and Inquiring mind(s) wish to know: Why, in an “Entry” is there both an invoice (text) and a bill (text) field, only one of which is ever used, and i_price_num/denom and b_price_num/denom fields, only one (pair) of which is ever used, based

Re: Gmock issue

2018-01-11 Thread John Ralls
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 5:32 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 11 januari 2018 11:20:45 CET schreef P Levine: >>> On Jan 7, 2018, at 2:10 PM, John Ralls wrote: On Jan 7, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Fabio Coatti wrote: Hi All, I'm having a look at gnucash 2.7.3 but I'

Re: Boost/Python

2018-01-11 Thread John Ralls
It might indeed work. The core devs are focussed on other priorities ATM so if you’d like to work it out we’ll look forward to your PR. Regards, John Ralls > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Alen Siljak wrote: > > From my limited knowledge of Python, this sounds like something that could be > mit

Re: Gmock issue

2018-01-11 Thread Geert Janssens
Op donderdag 11 januari 2018 11:20:45 CET schreef P Levine: > > On Jan 7, 2018, at 2:10 PM, John Ralls wrote: > >> On Jan 7, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Fabio Coatti > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> I'm having a look at gnucash 2.7.3 but I'm unable to compile it, as the > >> compilation spews a > >> >

Re: Re: Gmock issue

2018-01-11 Thread P Levine
> On Jan 7, 2018, at 2:10 PM, John Ralls wrote: >> On Jan 7, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Fabio Coatti wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> I'm having a look at gnucash 2.7.3 but I'm unable to compile it, as the >> compilation spews a >> >> make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/gmock-all.cc', needed by >> 'libgmock_a-gm

Re: Boost/Python

2018-01-11 Thread Alen Siljak
From my limited knowledge of Python, this sounds like something that could be mitigated by a virtual environment, perhaps? In that case, there could be the "officially-supported" version of Python so an advanced user would have to set up the virtual environment with that version, et

Re: Boost/Python

2018-01-11 Thread cicko
Success! At least a limited one. I've assembled a small demo - retrieving the GnuCash version from core-utilities. https://github.com/MisterY/gnucash-portfolio.net Some more prototyping needed, mostly in mapping the unmanaged types to managed. I'll try this approach first, before setting up a wh