On Thursday 14 January 2016 10:47:06 Mike Evans wrote:
> I occurs to me that the regex for with-quotes now also accepts fields
> without-quotes too, so the importer doesn't need the without-quotes
> options.
I don't think they are equivalent and their choice depends on the input format
of the use
I occurs to me that the regex for with-quotes now also accepts fields
without-quotes too, so the importer doesn't need the without-quotes options.
Also I'm wondering if the custom regex option is required or likely to be ever
used by anyone?
I'd file a separate bug/enhancement for this.
Mike
