Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread John Ralls
> On May 28, 2015, at 1:46 PM, gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt > wrote: > > Thank you very much to discuss with me. > >> That changes the way the database is interpreted > > I disagree. > > If the user loads a .gnucash file then edits it and saves it, the date field > of > a preexisting transact

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt
Thank you very much to discuss with me. > That changes the way the database is interpreted I disagree. If the user loads a .gnucash file then edits it and saves it, the date field of a preexisting transaction only changes if: - the date field used another timezone than + (gnucash-2.4), in w

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread John Ralls
> On May 28, 2015, at 10:26 AM, gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt > wrote: > >> Daniel, >> >> Please don't submit patches to the mailing list. Open a bug in >> Bugzilla.gnome.org or fork our repo on Github, create a branch with your >> patch, and make a pull request. > > I'll choose the buzgilla bug

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt
2015-05-28 20:02 UTC+02:00, Michael Ferrara : > I see how noting transaction times down to the fraction of a second could > be useful for quantitative analysis of a stock market. Among the multiple date format used (from memory: struct tm, Timespec, time64, GDate, GDateTime, {int day, month, year}

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread Michael Ferrara
I see how noting transaction times down to the fraction of a second could be useful for quantitative analysis of a stock market. For instance, I know a guy working on relativistic trading... That is, markets and computers are getting so fast that the SEC has to factor in nano-seconds, GPS, and Eins

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt
> Daniel, > > Please don't submit patches to the mailing list. Open a bug in > Bugzilla.gnome.org or fork our repo on Github, create a branch with your > patch, and make a pull request. I'll choose the buzgilla bug. I'll then ask my boss if I can take time for a github account (would be my first

Re: business problems

2015-05-28 Thread Derek Atkins
John Ralls writes: > Could be. Counters are maintained in KVP directly from Scheme. Moving > all KVP to libqof is my current development project; I intend to > rewrite the File>Properties stuff in C++ as part of that effort. > > Where are the invoice-customer links kept? The invoice transaction

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread John Ralls
> On May 28, 2015, at 6:37 AM, gLETTERyYuMEANSj LETTERyOt > wrote: > > Dear developers, > > For my work I had to patch gnucash-2.6.5 so that time of transactions are > displayed and editable, and so that new transactions are correctly > timestamped. > > I plan to release the resulting patche

Re: Patch : editing "Posted" time of transactions.

2015-05-28 Thread Geert Janssens
Hi Daniel, I'm pleased to hear you have been working on gnucash for your work :) Your work is in a way one possible solution for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137017 and https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89439 And we also have two voting tickets on uservoice: http://gnucash