On Monday 30 March 2015 10:15:10 John Ralls wrote:
> > On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Geert Janssens
> > wrote:>
> > On Saturday 28 March 2015 12:56:10 John Ralls wrote:
> >>> On Mar 28, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Geert Janssens
> >>> wrote:
> >>> What is the original reason it was implemented this way ? O
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 28 March 2015 12:56:10 John Ralls wrote:
>>> On Mar 28, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Geert Janssens
>>> wrote:
>>> What is the original reason it was implemented this way ? Or put
>>> differently is there (still) a good reason to avoi
David,
Thank you for your input. It more or less summarizes what I believe is a
pretty common versioning strategy in many free software projects. And
since we are a free software project ourselves we"d need good reasons to
follow a different route as doing so reduces the common knowledge
advan
On Saturday 28 March 2015 12:56:10 John Ralls wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Geert Janssens
> > wrote:
> > What is the original reason it was implemented this way ? Or put
> > differently is there (still) a good reason to avoid on the fly swig
> > code generation for a (release) tarball b
