On 22 May 2014, at 07:26, Herbert Thoma wrote:
> Am 22.05.2014 16:11, schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> Clint Redwood writes:
>>
>>> Hi Derek,
>>>
>>> Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
>>> you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
>>
>> I have
Am 22.05.2014 16:11, schrieb Derek Atkins:
Clint Redwood writes:
Hi Derek,
Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
I have no idea what locale I would want. Most likely I'd have to use
en_UK becaus
On 22 May 2014, at 00:12, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:19:52AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>> While we're on the subject of runTests.py, we've got a configure
>> substitution for the shebang. Is there some platform (MinGW maybe?) where
>> `#!/usr/bin/env python` doesn't wor
Clint Redwood writes:
> Hi Derek,
>
> Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
> you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
I have no idea what locale I would want. Most likely I'd have to use
en_UK because, as you suggest, en_DE probably doesn'
On 22 May 2014, at 02:08, Clint Redwood wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
>
> Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
> you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
It doesn't, and libc's setlocale() complains and sets the 'C' locale if you try
to use it
Hi Derek,
Good point - but what would your localisation setup be in that case? Ideally
you'd want en_DE, which I presume doesn't usually exist?
You could set the tax jurisdition as a separate core option, or I guess you
could base it on the default report currency for the instance.
This
Hi again!
Can anyone tell me what the number and boolean mean in the tax code
definitions? I've scoured the scheme code and can't find any explanation, and
so I thought rather than hacking any further, I'd ask...
I get most of the values. I'm not quite sure about the none/not-impl/parent,
On Wednesday 07 May 2014 16:12:36 Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 May 2014 14:18:03 Wm Tarr wrote:
> > that the user doesn't really need to see. I'm probably going to run
> > my install.sh with output to a file from now on. Is anyone else
> > already doing this?
>
> Whether you wish to s
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 09:56:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> It may well be a GnuCash problem, it's just that the actual crash isn't
> occurring in GnuCash code. In order to get an intelligible stack trace you
> need the debugging symbols for the shared library where the crash occurred
> and an
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:19:52AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> While we're on the subject of runTests.py, we've got a configure substitution
> for the shebang. Is there some platform (MinGW maybe?) where `#!/usr/bin/env
> python` doesn't work?
There are platforms where "python" doesn't exist, onl
10 matches
Mail list logo