On Nov 4, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Robert Ratliff wrote:
> On 11/4/2013 12:29 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> • Configure will abort if --enable-ofx is set but no libofx
>> configuration files are found. Contributed by Robert Ratliff.
>
> The bug fix above (Configure will abort if...) was not contributed
On 11/4/2013 12:29 PM, John Ralls wrote:
• Configure will abort if --enable-ofx is set but no libofx
configuration files are found. Contributed by Robert Ratliff.
The bug fix above (Configure will abort if...) was not contributed by me.
• Budget periods may no longer set to values greater th
On 05/11/2013 08:58, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 1:48 PM, David Carlson wrote:
>
>> Why have we not heard from anyone 'Down Under' about this issue? I
>> would expect that checks would still be used in places such as Australia
>> and New Zealand. Also, what about South America or Asi
On Nov 4, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> With 2.5.7 out of the door, I would like to look ahead at 2.6.
>
> I have just gone through the open bugs targeting the 2.6 milestone and
> reduced the set from 21 to 14. Some of the bugs I removed were actually
> bugs against register2 whic
On Nov 4, 2013, at 1:48 PM, David Carlson wrote:
>
> Why have we not heard from anyone 'Down Under' about this issue? I
> would expect that checks would still be used in places such as Australia
> and New Zealand. Also, what about South America or Asia?
>
Well, the folks in New Zealand and
On Monday 04 November 2013 22:34:01 Geert Janssens wrote:
> With 2.5.7 out of the door, I would like to look ahead at 2.6.
>
> I have just gone through the open bugs targeting the 2.6 milestone and
> reduced the set from 21 to 14. Some of the bugs I removed were
> actually bugs against register2 w
On 11/4/2013 12:36 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Thomas Troesch wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Ralls
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anyway, the question isn't what's the right way to write out the amount in
>> words for each language, the question is whether th
With 2.5.7 out of the door, I would like to look ahead at 2.6.
I have just gone through the open bugs targeting the 2.6 milestone and
reduced the set from 21 to 14. Some of the bugs I removed were actually
bugs against register2 which is not a feature for 2.6 any more. Some
need more info befor
On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> John,
>
> Thanks for pushing the release. It is another step closer to 2.6, with
> additional bugfixes and polish.
>
> There are a few things in the release announcement that are not
> completely accurate (any more):
>
> - The settings mi
John,
Thanks for pushing the release. It is another step closer to 2.6, with
additional bugfixes and polish.
There are a few things in the release announcement that are not
completely accurate (any more):
- The settings migration tool will only run once as of 2.5.7. It is no
longer necessary
On Nov 4, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Thomas Troesch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Ralls
> wrote:
>
>
> Anyway, the question isn't what's the right way to write out the amount in
> words for each language, the question is whether the Wikipedia article cited
> earlier in the
GnuCash 2.5.7 (Unstable) released
The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 2.5.7, the eighth
release in the 2.5.x series of the GnuCash Free Accounting Software which will
eventually lead to the stable version 2.6.0. It runs on GNU/Linux, *BSD,
Solaris and Mac OSX.
WARNING: This
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>
> Anyway, the question isn't what's the right way to write out the amount in
> words for each language, the question is whether the Wikipedia article
> cited earlier in the thread is correct that checks are used only in the US,
> UK, and Canada
Am 04.11.2013 09:08, schrieb Martin Mainka:
Am 4.11.2013 05:54, schrieb John Ralls:
Actually, if the text and number disagree the bank is supposed to
reject the check. Anyway, the question isn't what's the right way to
write out the amount in words for each language, the question is
whether the
On Sunday 03 November 2013 20:54:46 John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Buddha Buck
wrote:
> > In the US at least it is customary to write out the amount and put
> > it in digits. My checkbook in front of me has a form like:
> >
> >
> > Pay to the order of
> > _
Am 4.11.2013 05:54, schrieb John Ralls:
> Actually, if the text and number disagree the bank is supposed to
> reject the check. Anyway, the question isn't what's the right way to
> write out the amount in words for each language, the question is
> whether the Wikipedia article cited earlier in the
16 matches
Mail list logo