2013.07.03 23:07, Cristian Marchi rašė:
>
> Il 03/07/2013 21:36, Aurimas Fišeras ha scritto:
>> 2013.07.03 21:45, Cristian Marchi rašė:
>>> I've a problem applying this patch to trunk. Did you update locally the
>>> template?
>> Yes, I did. But this shouldn't matter since only lt.po is modified an
Il 03/07/2013 21:36, Aurimas Fišeras ha scritto:
2013.07.03 21:45, Cristian Marchi rašė:
I've a problem applying this patch to trunk. Did you update locally the
template?
Yes, I did. But this shouldn't matter since only lt.po is modified and
the patch is generated against trunk. And the rebase
2013.07.03 21:45, Cristian Marchi rašė:
> I've a problem applying this patch to trunk. Did you update locally the
> template?
Yes, I did. But this shouldn't matter since only lt.po is modified and
the patch is generated against trunk. And the rebased patch is identical
to the one I sent on Sunday.
I've a problem applying this patch to trunk. Did you update locally the
template?
I can update all po files in trunk by extracting latest strings and
applying your patch but I don't know how is the policy on updating po
files in trunk. Maybe some more experienced dev can give advice on this.
On 02-07-13 20:53, Christian Stimming wrote:
Dear Geert or John or whoever knows this,
where does gnucash store the database password for MySQL or PostgreSQL
backend? It stores the database name, host, and username directly in the URI,
which is also visible in the file history. The URI (without
2013.07.03 17:11, John Ralls rašė:
>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 6:57 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> Sorry, that didn't make sense. What I meant to say is that one should pass
> variables to _() only
> if the constant values have been flagged to xgettext so that they're in the
> message catalog. I
> don'
On Jul 3, 2013, at 6:57 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
>> On 03-07-13 14:34, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
>>> 2013.07.03 15:26, Geert Janssens rašė:
Hi Aurimas,
Thanks for the patch.
I have looked at it but didn't apply it ye
On Jul 3, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On 03-07-13 14:34, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
>> 2013.07.03 15:26, Geert Janssens rašė:
>>> Hi Aurimas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>>
>>> I have looked at it but didn't apply it yet. My knowledge of gettext is
>>> limited, but it looks odd to
On 03-07-13 14:34, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
2013.07.03 15:26, Geert Janssens rašė:
Hi Aurimas,
Thanks for the patch.
I have looked at it but didn't apply it yet. My knowledge of gettext is
limited, but it looks odd to me to wrap a variable inside the _() macro.
I noticed this was the same in the
2013.07.03 15:26, Geert Janssens rašė:
> Hi Aurimas,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> I have looked at it but didn't apply it yet. My knowledge of gettext is
> limited, but it looks odd to me to wrap a variable inside the _() macro.
> I noticed this was the same in the old code you refer to, but I d
Hi Aurimas,
Thanks for the patch.
I have looked at it but didn't apply it yet. My knowledge of gettext is
limited, but it looks odd to me to wrap a variable inside the _() macro.
I noticed this was the same in the old code you refer to, but I don't
know if this is correct or not. Perhaps some
11 matches
Mail list logo
