On May 16, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, 12:53:16 schrieb John Ralls:
>> On May 16, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
>>> --On May 16, 2013 11:42:39 AM -0700 John Ralls wrote:
> These questions are not criticisms, but really intended to s
Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, 12:53:16 schrieb John Ralls:
> On May 16, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
> > --On May 16, 2013 11:42:39 AM -0700 John Ralls wrote:
> >>> These questions are not criticisms, but really intended to stimulate
> >>> us to review or current ChangeLog process. Is
On May 16, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
> --On May 16, 2013 11:42:39 AM -0700 John Ralls wrote:
>
>>> These questions are not criticisms, but really intended to stimulate
>>> us to review or current ChangeLog process. Is it still ok or time
>>> to improve ?
>>
>> I'll go further:
--On May 16, 2013 11:42:39 AM -0700 John Ralls
wrote:
These questions are not criticisms, but really intended to stimulate
us to review or current ChangeLog process. Is it still ok or time
to improve ?
I'll go further: It makes far more sense for release tarballs to just
have a digest of im
On May 16, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> I'm looking into the remaining bits preventing a full git migration when 2.6
> will be released.
>
> One item on the list is our automatic changelog generation in the toplevel's
> makefile. This
> currently converts the svn log into a GNU
I'm looking into the remaining bits preventing a full git migration when 2.6
will be released.
One item on the list is our automatic changelog generation in the toplevel's
makefile. This
currently converts the svn log into a GNU style ChangeLog file.
It's easy to replicate something very simil
Am Montag, 13. Mai 2013, 17:35:01 schrieb Allen S. Rout:
> ... Now, what I'm doing is
>
> make
> cd src/bin
> ./gnucash
>
> ... Is there some reason I should expect this to fail? I can remove the
> system gnucash, and install this in my homedir, if that'll be necessary
> for development work.
I
Just for your information, I have pushed a couple of changes to the
repository that will change the tag build behaviour on our windows build
server:
- all (new) tags starting from 2.5.0 will from now on be built from a git
repository
- all (new) tags for the 2.4 series continue to be built from
