On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:22 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 12:41 PM, "Derek Atkins" wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> On Fri, November 9, 2012 2:47 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>>
>>> Any objections to converting all Timespecs to time_t64? (I decided that
>>> time_t64 is clearer than gnc_time_t.)
On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> On Fri, November 9, 2012 5:22 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>> How about storing it in the book, and storing it as a pair of Month/Day
>>> tuples? :) This also maps nicely into "current Period" and "last
>>> Period". :)
>>
>> How about what t
On Fri, November 9, 2012 5:22 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>> How about storing it in the book, and storing it as a pair of Month/Day
>> tuples? :) This also maps nicely into "current Period" and "last
>> Period". :)
>
> How about what the government calls a "Julian Day", the number of days
> after
On Nov 9, 2012, at 12:41 PM, "Derek Atkins" wrote:
> John,
>
> On Fri, November 9, 2012 2:47 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> Any objections to converting all Timespecs to time_t64? (I decided that
>> time_t64 is clearer than gnc_time_t.)
>
> As opposed to time64_t?
Maybe. There's int64_t in sys/
John,
On Fri, November 9, 2012 2:47 pm, John Ralls wrote:
>
> Any objections to converting all Timespecs to time_t64? (I decided that
> time_t64 is clearer than gnc_time_t.)
As opposed to time64_t?
> Another issue which I just discovered is that we're using GConf to store
> time_t values for the
On Nov 6, 2012, at 7:28 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> I'm keeping Timespec/GncDate for now because I'm not ready to redo all of the
> Timespec-based code in engine. Similarly, I wrote gnc_localtime etc as a
> drop-in replacement for g_localtime and friends. That's the only way I'm
> going to be
On Friday 09 Nov 2012, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Ngewi Fet writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > John Ralls writes:
> > > Why can't we set up commit hooks on each that immediately push to
> > > the other? Yes, there's a small chance of a conflict if two peop
Ngewi Fet writes:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> John Ralls writes:
>
> > Why can't we set up commit hooks on each that immediately push to the
> > other? Yes, there's a small chance of a conflict if two people push
> > changes of the same file to
