Re: r22289 - gnucash/trunk/src - Initial code for a new register.

2012-08-10 Thread Geert Janssens
Hi Frank, Bob provided a patch for these warnings, which I have committed. Thanks for reporting this. Geert On 10-08-12 09:51, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote: Hi Geert, and I get a bunch of warnings: ../../../src/gnome-utils/gnc-tree-model-split-reg.c: In function 'gnc_tree_model_split_reg_iter

Re: r22289 - gnucash/trunk/src - Initial code for a new register.

2012-08-10 Thread Geert Janssens
Alex, Thanks for pointing this out. Obviously the new files related to the register rewrite were forgotten in POTFILES.in. John already added the files in POTFILES.skip in the meantime, but I prefer having them included in POTFILES.in instead, or we might forget to add them when the register

Re: Scripting

2012-08-10 Thread John Ralls
On Aug 10, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On 10-08-12 15:54, John Ralls wrote: >> On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:22 AM, reubano wrote: >>> So according to the wiki[1] should we follow directions for Non-Committers >>> or Committers? I would think the best option would be to clone and then >>>

Re: Scripting

2012-08-10 Thread Geert Janssens
On 10-08-12 15:54, John Ralls wrote: On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:22 AM, reubano wrote: So according to the wiki[1] should we follow directions for Non-Committers or Committers? I would think the best option would be to clone and then submit pull requests but I'm not sure if things are setup to work t

Re: Scripting

2012-08-10 Thread John Ralls
On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:22 AM, reubano wrote: > So according to the wiki[1] should we follow directions for Non-Committers > or Committers? I would think the best option would be to clone and then > submit pull requests but I'm not sure if things are setup to work that way. > > [1] http://wiki.gnu

Re: Scripting

2012-08-10 Thread reubano
Derek Atkins wrote > > Hendrik Boom writes: > >> I hadn't known about the python bindings. First, it would make sense for >> me to try to use the python bindings to see if I can do what I need, >> writing a kind of a diary of what I discover I need to know and producing >> bi

r22289 - gnucash/trunk/src - Initial code for a new register.

2012-08-10 Thread Robert Fewell
Hi, I wrote the patch associated to bug 673193 that Geert has added. I have added a patch to that bug to fix the errors reported by Frank. I wanted to see if it was possible to get a tree view based register to look like the current format and is based on a started register rewrite some time ago.

Re: r22289 - gnucash/trunk/src - Initial code for a new register.

2012-08-10 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Hi Geert, and I get a bunch of warnings: ../../../src/gnome-utils/gnc-tree-model-split-reg.c: In function 'gnc_tree_model_split_reg_iter_children': ../../../src/gnome-utils/gnc-tree-model-split-reg.c:905:11: error: 'snode' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] ../../..

Re: Backport policy; was: svn - git sync stopped working ?

2012-08-10 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Am 05.08.2012 15:46, schrieb Geert Janssens: > Hi Frank, > > Which commits do you think should get backported ? : After a long busy time I remembered my passphrase. ;-) When I watched configure.ac, I saw warlord backporting his change, while your Changeset 22277 is only in trunk. So I was unsure