On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> No, that won't work, because it will still need $PATH to find its dlls.
>
> Not if all the dependent DLLs are in the same directory as the .exe
>
Perhaps I said that wrong. It won't work if it can find the wrong DLLs
On 30 January 2012 17:47, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Geert Janssens writes:
>
>> Well, I'm not sure about that. On fedora the libgnome library is also
>> in the subdirectory of libglade, just as on Ubuntu. I don't think the
>> libraries in that directory are loaded via the normal LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>> se
Geert Janssens writes:
> Well, I'm not sure about that. On fedora the libgnome library is also
> in the subdirectory of libglade, just as on Ubuntu. I don't think the
> libraries in that directory are loaded via the normal LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> settings, but using a manual call to ldopen or something
Op zondag 29 januari 2012 21:48:08 schreef Colin Law:
> On 29 January 2012 20:24, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Op vrijdag 27 januari 2012 11:05:38 schreef Colin Law:
> >> ...
> >> I had a look at the packaged version of gnucash in the Ubuntu 12.04
> >> repository and realised that this suffers from t
John Ralls writes:
> No, that won't work, because it will still need $PATH to find its dlls.
Not if all the dependent DLLs are in the same directory as the .exe
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board
Thanks Geert for your opinion. I've applied the xea accounts file
modifications in 2.4 branch also to trunk.
Regards
Cristian
Il 29/01/2012 21:07, Geert Janssens ha scritto:
Op zondag 15 januari 2012 09:31:24 schreef Cristian Marchi:
That was my concern: if this kind of patch is considered tr
