Christian--
A while back I mentioned that the first hits in a Google search for a Gnucash
tutorial returns outdated documentation.
I just did a new search on "gnucash tutorial," and the top hit for me is still
the v1.8 guide. The svn version is listed second, while the 2.4 version in pdf
is
Christian Stimming writes:
>> Is there still a way, other than as a report, to run a scheme script that
>> uses gnucash's API?
>
> Sorry, I don't know. For python it has been described a little bit more (in
> the optional/python directory), and that's also what I would suggest to use.
Yes:g
Am Montag, 14. November 2011 schrieb Hendrik Boom:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:17:38 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Hendrik Boom writes:
> (3) This library would be the basis for scripting interfaces to
> gnucash. The API would make the gnucash library itself indifferent to
> the scrip
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:17:38 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hendrik Boom writes:
>
(3) This library would be the basis for scripting interfaces to
gnucash. The API would make the gnucash library itself indifferent to
the scripting language being used. Of course, the API must still
On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 14 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2011, at 5:04 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>> With a generous dose of grep and some perl, I've compiled some lists of
>>> unused functions. I've commented them out in the code and gotten a
On maandag 14 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2011, at 5:04 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> > With a generous dose of grep and some perl, I've compiled some lists of
> > unused functions. I've commented them out in the code and gotten a
> > successful "make check". The one thing I can't do is
On Nov 13, 2011, at 11:42 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Dear John,
>
> thanks for looking up those unused functions. In general, I agree those
> should be removed. Have you also checked whether any of those are called from
> the Scheme files (with underscores replaces by dashes)? This should
