Sounds like an interesting experiment. One current problem with webkit is that
the win32 build environment for the windows build doesn't easily support
getting
newer versions of webkit/gtk as they are developed. We currently use a build
of
webkit 1.1.90 and are stuck with this. I am looking
On Jan 20, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Andy Clayton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been playing around with using Flot (http://code.google.com/p/flot/) to
> replace the goffice report graphs, and it seems to work well. It
> (re?)introduces interactivity and overall looks much more modern. It's rather
> clea
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:49 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>> There are two things I'd like to get done before we release 2.4.1: I'd like
>> to complete the version control for the sql backend (and I found yesterday
>> that I've a bit more
Hi all,
I've been playing around with using Flot
(http://code.google.com/p/flot/) to replace the goffice report graphs,
and it seems to work well. It (re?)introduces interactivity and overall
looks much more modern. It's rather clean too, as the existing guile
modules are simply changed to ou
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:49 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> There are two things I'd like to get done before we release 2.4.1: I'd like
> to complete the version control for the sql backend (and I found yesterday
> that I've a bit more work to do on enforcing read-only on the qofbook)
What
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Developers,
>
> we should decide when to make our next release 2.4.1, and what should be
> included. In particular, we need to decide whether a 2.4.1 release should be
> made from trunk (development) or whether be better want to fork of
Developers,
we should decide when to make our next release 2.4.1, and what should be
included. In particular, we need to decide whether a 2.4.1 release should be
made from trunk (development) or whether be better want to fork off a 2.4-
stable branch where this 2.4.1 release is made from.
Since
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011 schrieb brad:
> Looks like libofx is not handling the aggregates that contain the fund
> prices.. It would probably be easier for me to write a
> script to pull the data out to a text file, then use the python script
> that Peter Holterman just posted to import i
Am 19.01.2011 21:54, schrieb Brian St. Pierre:
> I opened a bug and attached a patch that seems to fix the problem:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639980
>
> There is a similar piece of code in
> src/optional/python-bindings/glib.i, but changing this did not seem to
> have an ef
