Re: Version references in documentation

2010-10-23 Thread Yawar Amin
Hi All, On 2010-08-26, at 00:20, Yawar Amin wrote: >> […] > > Good plan. I'm going through the docs now to familiarise myself with them, > and make the version number changes wherever possible. I'll post a patch to > the list soon. So as it turned out I really took my time familiarising mysel

Re: [PATCH] Repair automatch_store_transactions

2010-10-23 Thread Christian Stimming
Thanks for the reminder. I'm sorry nobody came around to give more feedback. I'll look into this the next days. However, AFAIK your patch introduces new strings. Unfortunately we are currently in string freeze for another few weeks until 2.4.0 is out. After that, you patch can go into SVN right

Re: [PATCH] Repair automatch_store_transactions

2010-10-23 Thread Simon Ruggier
Hi all, I'd appreciate it if someone would take the time to review and respond to my previous message. I've reattached the patches for your convenience. On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Simon Ruggier wrote: > Hey all, I finally finished implementing everything I mentioned back > in early 2009, e

Re: Getting 2.4 Released - Yes!

2010-10-23 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 23 October 2010, John Ralls wrote: > Are you still working on 630770 (the crash when db loses its connection)? Yes, I should have a patch ready pretty soon. Geert ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash

Re: Getting 2.4 Released - Yes!

2010-10-23 Thread John Ralls
On Oct 23, 2010, at 5:10 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Saturday 16 October 2010, Christian Stimming wrote: >> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=GnuCash&bug_status=UNCONFIRM >> ED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&target_milestone= >> 2.4.0 >> > Shouldn't th

Re: Getting 2.4 Released - Yes!

2010-10-23 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 16 October 2010, Christian Stimming wrote: > Dear John, > > I completely agree. It's been two months already since the last test > release, and we didn't see any significant progress in the last fields > that were expected to be fixed before 2.4.0. > > Am Saturday 16 October 2010 sc