On 18.10.2010 19:19, Thomas Bullock wrote:
Hi Herbert,
You said:
Personally, I have been using the 2.5 branch for my real financial data for at
least half a year now (with XML backend) and never experienced any problems.
That's a typo. I meant the 2.3 branch (the current development in tru
I've completely removed the preferences section (moved to GC help
manual) and I'm looking into some small modifications. I hope I can
commit the changes in a couple of day.
Il 18/10/2010 21:17, Thomas Bullock ha scritto:
Cristian,
Do I remember correctly that you have started working on remov
Cristian,
Do I remember correctly that you have started working on removing duplications
between the two manuals?
If so, have you finished with Chapter 2, the Basics? I have some small changes
to make there in order to complete a prior install.
If not, can you tell me when you expect to insta
Commited to rev 19671
Thanks for contributing!
Regards
Cristian
Il 18/10/2010 20:46, Valdis Vītoliņš ha scritto:
Hello!
Please commit latest updates for attached lv.po file.
Thanks,
Valdis
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.
On Monday 18 October 2010, Thomas Bullock wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geert Janssens [mailto:janssens-ge...@telenet.be]
> >
> > Yes, it's more accurate as it is written now. I have only corrected
> > the
> > explanation to get help on the svn diff command. "man di
Hi Geert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Geert Janssens [mailto:janssens-ge...@telenet.be]
> Yes, it's more accurate as it is written now. I have only corrected
> the
> explanation to get help on the svn diff command. "man diff" will give
> you the
> manual page for the standard diff comman
On Oct 18, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
> John --
>
> This is reminiscent of a bug, 609583, that I reported and you and I worked on
> earlier this year. I just wanted to remind you of it in case the issues are
> the same (I haven't read the two bug reports carefully) and, if so, ther
On Monday 18 October 2010, Thomas Bullock wrote:
> Hi Geert,
Hi Thomas,
>
> Thank you again for the summary instructions on how to write a wiki page.
> I finally got time to see what you had done. I made only a couple of
> cosmetic tweaks and a few words to clarify something I had missed. Tha
John --
This is reminiscent of a bug, 609583, that I reported and you and I worked
on earlier this year. I just wanted to remind you of it in case the issues
are the same (I haven't read the two bug reports carefully) and, if so,
there might be something of use to you in the older report..
/Don
Hi Geert,
> For your reference, here's a very short summary of (most of) what I
> did:
> * titles: surround with ==...==
> * subtitles are created by surrounding them with one additional = per
> sublevel, so for example first subtitles will be ===...===
> * numbered lists: replace "1. ", "2. ",...
Hi Herbert,
You said:
Personally, I have been using the 2.5 branch for my real financial data for at
least half a year now (with XML backend) and never experienced any problems.
Herbert.
Please clarify the branch you are referring to. If the debate is when to
declare 2.4 the next offici
For a bug as grave as this one it is completely ok to break the string
freeze. You can just go ahead and commit. Thanks!
Christian
Zitat von John Ralls :
I've been working on
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632166 this afternoon. I
can reproduce the bug, and I've added (but no
On 17.10.2010 20:08, Yawar Amin wrote:
On 2010-10-17, at 04:33, Christian Stimming wrote:
Alternatively, we can admit to ourselves there isn't too big of a point to
have the SQL backends as headline feature, and then we're almost done.
Agreed, SQL can always be a headliner for 2.5. We can ite
13 matches
Mail list logo
