Hello devel:
I am interested in the ability to make links to images. see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336843
As I looked into this, the notion came to me that a more general and
user accessible meta data interface may satisfy image links as well as
another long standing enhancement
Update and Reminder: This planned outage will happen this WEDNESDAY,
February 17, starting around 8am US/EST. Hopefully the systems will be
back online within about 12 hours, but that all depends on the network
move going well, too.
I'll update the website and send out email prior to the move, a
Hi again,
it's been a week now and no answers? Aren't you interested in fixing this?
I have now tried a few other things: The old 2.2.6 debian packages fail with a
segfault. So I went to great lengths and compiled the 2.2.6 svn-tag on my
system with debugging enabled. I've had to fix many depre
Thanks Geert,
I hope the original patch writer does not get discouraged by this. The
patch just needs to include the option to disable the feature to be useful.
And by default, to be off.
Regards,
Kim Wood
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Please-back-out-r18428-editabl
Am Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
> Author: plongstaff
> Date: 2010-02-13 09:08:31 -0500 (Sat, 13 Feb 2010)
> New Revision: 18653
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/18653
>
> Removed:
>gnucash/tags/2.3.9/
> Log:
> Untagging so the build can be kicked off. Don't r
On Sunday 14 February 2010, Colin Law wrote:
> On 13 February 2010 11:45, Kim Wood wrote:
> > The has been some discussion in the user forum at
> > http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html
> >#a1476778 about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is particularly bad and
>
On 13 February 2010 11:45, Kim Wood wrote:
>
> The has been some discussion in the user forum at
> http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html#a1476778
> about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is particularly bad and should be
> removed for two reasons.
> ...
> Can this
