Re: Please back out r18428 - editable 2nd date field

2010-02-13 Thread Volker Englisch
On 02/13/2010 06:45 AM, Kim Wood wrote: [...] Am I alone in thinking that the register in double line mode now looks less user friendly? I'm not a developer but I agree with you completely. -- Volker Englisch mailto:vol...@englisch.us ___ gnucash

Re: Please back out r18428 - editable 2nd date field

2010-02-13 Thread Jeff Kletsky
I have to strongly second this request. In my opinion, this is a "half-complete" feature. At a minimum, until there is a preference setting available, in my opinion, this should not be part of the trunk. Arguably, until sorting and searching is also available on the new field, similar to the

Re: discrepency in version of Windows release

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 13 February 2010, Anne Lawrence wrote: > I clicked on the link on http://www.gnucash.org/ for the latest stable > version of gnucash for Windows, which is advertised as v2.2.9 and > downloaded it. The file downloaded was v2.3.3. I have been running it > but it has appeared with a me

Please back out r18428 - editable 2nd date field

2010-02-13 Thread Kim Wood
The has been some discussion in the user forum at http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html#a1476778 about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is particularly bad and should be removed for two reasons. Firstly, in double line register display mode, the two dates display

discrepency in version of Windows release

2010-02-13 Thread Anne Lawrence
I clicked on the link on http://www.gnucash.org/ for the latest stable version of gnucash for Windows, which is advertised as v2.2.9 and downloaded it. The file downloaded was v2.3.3. I have been running it but it has appeared with a message that it is not a stable build. I have recently star

qof vs gnc functions ?

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
I was looking into this bug that seemed a fairly trivial to fix: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343727 That is, if some consensus can be reached on what type the currency should be from a qof point of view. The op proposed QOF_TYPE_STRING, although Derek wasn't fully convinced. And i

Re: Post invoice dialog default focus

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 12 February 2010, Tommy Trussell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> Geert Janssens writes: > >> > I'm not aware of this focus issue in the register. What is the problem > >> > exactly ? (Link t

Re: Patchfile - corrections to taxtxf.scm

2010-02-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena: > Christian, > > I attach a patchfile that corrects two problems with taxtxf.scm: Applied to trunk (will be in 2.3.9 once it is released). Thanks a lot! By the way, patches in bugzilla are IMHO somewhat easier to handle because for patches

Re: Patchfile - corrections to taxtxf.scm

2010-02-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena: > Christian, > > I was thinking after sending this, should it be applied to both trunk and > 2.3.9? I guess you mean 2.2.9, the 2.2-branch? No, we won't make any further 2.2.x release, so we also don't need to apply any patch to that. Rega

Re: r18644 - gnucash/trunk/src/backend/sql - Fix comment close

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 12 February 2010, Phil Longstaff wrote: > Author: plongstaff > Date: 2010-02-12 12:45:59 -0500 (Fri, 12 Feb 2010) > New Revision: 18644 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/18644 > > Modified: >gnucash/trunk/src/backend/sql/gnc-backend-sql.h > Log: > Fix comment close > >