On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 21:01, Clark wrote:
..
> Forgive me if I am being redundant, but I want to be sure I am understood.
>
> I don't think it is in the XML code, I don't think it has anything to do
> with DocBook or the XML. I think it is in the .png, .jpg, .tif, .whatever
> image file that it
On June 19, 2009 06:53:46 pm Chris Dennis wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> Firstly, I've added a new version of eguile-gnc.scm itself to bug
> 574582. The only change is improved error reporting. eguile-gnc has
> been stable and reliable for me. Could it be included in 2.4, even if
> eguile-based report
Hello folks
Firstly, I've added a new version of eguile-gnc.scm itself to bug
574582. The only change is improved error reporting. eguile-gnc has
been stable and reliable for me. Could it be included in 2.4, even if
eguile-based reports aren't ready yet? That way, it will be in place
for peop
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 17:08, Clark wrote:
> I used Adobe Acrobat Pro to do a pre-press on the PDF. The images which
> print too big are specified to be at 75 DPI, the ones that print right are
> about 120~126 DPI. In all cases the numbers are not exact, and vary
> slightly from image to image.
I used Adobe Acrobat Pro to do a pre-press on the PDF. The images which
print too big are specified to be at 75 DPI, the ones that print right
are about 120~126 DPI. In all cases the numbers are not exact, and vary
slightly from image to image.
So what is happening is that the PDF specified
On May 31, 2009 12:41:13 pm Phil Longstaff wrote:
> On May 31, 2009 06:53:23 am Erwin Rieger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i have another funny problem with querying data from scheme with the
> > (my)sql backend.
> >
> > The query from my previous posts do only return transactions that
> > are/were shown
