Hello,
My first post to this list. I have found the site very helpful in
resolving issues I have had with my build of gnucash 2.2.3. However, now I
am stumped.
I completed a relatively clean compile from source of gnucash-2.2.3 and
during the startup the splash screen shows up and I get the ti
On Jan 29, 2008 4:16 PM, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 6:52 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Ian Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Charles,
> > >
> > > I've mostly been playing with the generic importer and seeing how that
> > could
> > > be
I recently bit the bullet and upgraded my Macbook Pro (Intel) from 10.4.11
Tiger to 10.5.1 Leopard, and I would like to share my success at getting
Fink/GnuCash back up and running. Please note that I share this mostly to say
"It worked the way it was supposed to"--and NOT to say this is how it wil
Hi,
On Di, 2008-01-29 at 09:52 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
8<
> Charles, you could get fix this by using
> something like svk, where you could commit your changes to a local
> branch, or using git-svn (where you can commit your changes to a local
> branch).
>
> Just a suggestion. I'm not
On Jan 29, 2008 6:52 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ian Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Charles,
> >
> > I've mostly been playing with the generic importer and seeing how that
> could
> > be applied to the QIF importer. Nothing practical really. At least at
> this
> > poin
Hi Stephen!
On Jan 29, 2008 6:57 AM, Stephen Grant Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nathan
> Thanks for your speedy reply.
> I think I read mingwn (or incorectly read mingvm) and wrote mingvm in my
> email.
> I have just did an svn update in the packaging directory.
> Nothing was updated and
Hi Nathan
Thanks for your speedy reply.
I think I read mingwn (or incorectly read mingvm) and wrote mingvm in my email.
I have just did an svn update in the packaging directory.
Nothing was updated and I am at revision 16889.
gnucash.iss.in has never been altered by me ( I did not even realize it w
"Ian Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Charles,
>
> I've mostly been playing with the generic importer and seeing how that could
> be applied to the QIF importer. Nothing practical really. At least at this
> point. While the generic importer would allow the reuse of dialogs, the QIF
> importer
