Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> [Sorry for the other empty response - accidentally sent. ]
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:58:51AM -0400, Chris Lyttle wrote:
>
>> Author: wilddev
>> Date: 2007-04-19 08:58:50 -0400 (Thu, 19 Apr 2007)
>> New Revision: 15939
>> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/1
--On April 18, 2007 1:57:51 -0400 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really think "trading accounts" is the WRONG approach for this problem.
>
> -derek
For what it's worth, if I actually used multiple currencies on a regular
basis I would have given up on GnuCash within the trial time
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:38:10AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Actually that didnt work. The correct syntax was svn copy -r 15892
> > svn+ssh://
>
> Are you sure? Chris.S had attempted to fix this once and the
> branch looked right in trac after h
I'm running the build on a single CPU here so I have no idea about
it being a race condition. Seems my latest build, over night, got
a lot further than ever before so I'll just stick with the retry
method.
About the binary installer... I've been using gnucash for a number
of years (on linux) and
Or you would "svn mv" the file.. But that requires SVN commit access.
-derek
Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave,
>
> I dont know if I've said this before to you, but THANKS. Updating the
> help is a long job and its a lot of work as you have found out. I'll try
> to get to lookin
Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually that didnt work. The correct syntax was svn copy -r 15892
> svn+ssh://
Are you sure? Chris.S had attempted to fix this once and the
branch looked right in trac after he made the change..
> Chris
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE
Hi,
"Hale Boyes, Kevin " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> Then,
>
> if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I. -I.. -I../include -I../generic-g -O2 -MT EntityManager.lo -MD
> -MP -MF ".deps/EntityManager.Tpo" -c -o EntityManager.lo
> EntityManager.cxx; \
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> This Saturday, April 21st, we're going to have the first GnuCash Bug
>> Day.
>> Bug Day will be ongoing from 15:00 [1] - 22:00 UTC in #gnucash on
>> irc.gnome.org ... please join us there! :)
>> [1]
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=4&day=21
"Daniel Espinosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's quite clear how to make small, measured changes in the existing
>> QOF/GNC objects toward using gobject correctly and completely.
>
> Have you considered the re-implementation work in order to make QOF
> fits in GObject (not completly)?
Yes.
Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15928
>>
>> Log:
>> Make sure that each GNCModule has a unique set of symbols.
>
> Just out of curiosity: Isn't this commit basically a partial revert
> of r
[Sorry for the other empty response - accidentally sent. ]
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:58:51AM -0400, Chris Lyttle wrote:
> Author: wilddev
> Date: 2007-04-19 08:58:50 -0400 (Thu, 19 Apr 2007)
> New Revision: 15939
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15939
>
> Added:
>gnucash/tags/2.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:58:51AM -0400, Chris Lyttle wrote:
> Author: wilddev
> Date: 2007-04-19 08:58:50 -0400 (Thu, 19 Apr 2007)
> New Revision: 15939
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15939
>
> Added:
>gnucash/tags/2.1.0/
> Log:
> Tagging the 2.1.0 release of GnuCash
>
> Cop
Quoting Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15928
>
> Log:
> Make sure that each GNCModule has a unique set of symbols.
Just out of curiosity: Isn't this commit basically a partial revert of
r15317 (the merged reshuffle-modules branch) or more specific
Dave,
I dont know if I've said this before to you, but THANKS. Updating the
help is a long job and its a lot of work as you have found out. I'll try
to get to looking this over this weekend.
As to putting the files in svn, normally if they are being renamed as
you are doing you rm the files loc
Christian Stimming wrote:
> Quoting Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Log:
Tagging the 2.1.0 release of GnuCash
Copied: gnucash/tags/2.1.0 (from rev 15912, gnucash/trunk)
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it make more sense if we tagged the revision that was
>>> released? I'm not sure which rev
15 matches
Mail list logo
