Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

2007-03-21 Thread Daniel Espinosa
2007/3/21, Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 00:42 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > > Get GObject as the base of GC's objects. With the following advantages: > > - Get ref counting > > - Get signals events > > Using GObject is a prerequisite of either of the separate

Re: undefined reference to gnome-utils functions

2007-03-21 Thread Nathan Buchanan
I was able to solve the crash of pexports.exe by replacing line 669 of install.sh with cd .. pexports -h include/htmlhelp.h $_HHCTRL_OCX > lib/htmlhelp.def cd lib I'm a bit stumped as to why it didn't like the original line: pexports -h ../include/htmlhelp.h $_HHCTRL_OCX > htmlhelp.def It built

Several basic(dumb?) questions on the Help Document

2007-03-21 Thread Dave Herman
While reviewing the Help document I have several questions. I'm using primarily svn (trunk r15744). FC6 1) The register display for a expense type account displays two amount fields labeled "Expense" and "Rebate". Is "rebate" the correct term? 2) When verifying the section on "Entering Multiple

Re: Build failure under Ubuntu 6.10

2007-03-21 Thread Nigel Titley
Andreas Köhler wrote: > Hi, > >> Quoting Nigel Titley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> Anyone any idea what's causing this build failure? Building latest SVN >>> under a fully patched Ubuntu 6.10. Built fine last week. >>> >>> make[5]: *** No rule to make target `libgncmod_gnome_utils_la_SOURCES', >>>

Re: [PATCH] Allow override of the dotfile location

2007-03-21 Thread Andreas Köhler
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2007, 21:22 + schrieb James Radley: > Hmm. After a quick read of the glib docs, I'd agree with you about the > $HOME variable, which is a fallback if glib can't work out the home > directory from /etc/passwd or similar. I've amended the patch slightly > below, to

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

2007-03-21 Thread Josh Sled
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 00:42 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > Get GObject as the base of GC's objects. With the following advantages: > - Get ref counting > - Get signals events Using GObject is a prerequisite of either of the separate "ref counting" and "signals" projects, but aren't a

Re: [PATCH] Allow override of the dotfile location

2007-03-21 Thread James Radley
Hmm. After a quick read of the glib docs, I'd agree with you about the $HOME variable, which is a fallback if glib can't work out the home directory from /etc/passwd or similar. I've amended the patch slightly below, to use g_getenv() as you suggest, and to g_strdup() the result before assignin

Re: [PATCH] Allow override of the dotfile location

2007-03-21 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 09:53 schrieb Derek Atkins: > Why not just run: > > HOME=... gnucash > > ??? Or does this no longer work now that we've changed to > g_get_home_dir()? According to the documentation of g_get_home_dir, this does *not* work any longer. I think this is a good extension

Windows build works again for me

2007-03-21 Thread Dave Reiser
r15744 successfully builds and runs for me under winXP. The $SF_MIRROR value in custom.sh doesn't work for retrieving docbook-xsl for me, though. I rummaged around manually on sourceforge and downloaded it manually. Docs work too, now. Dave -- David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: GObject in GC implementation Plan

2007-03-21 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:42:32AM -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > GOBJECT IN GC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: > > OBJECTIVE > > Get GObject as the base of GC's objects. With the following advantages: > - Get ref counting > - Get signals events > > > > STATE OF THE ART > > QOF is the objec

Re: [PATCH] Allow override of the dotfile location

2007-03-21 Thread Derek Atkins
Why not just run: HOME=... gnucash ??? Or does this no longer work now that we've changed to g_get_home_dir()? -derek James Radley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The attached patch allows you to override the '.gnucash' directory. > Currently, this always defaults to ${HOME}/.gnucash which

Re: [Inquiry]GNUCash SoC - Implementing Undo

2007-03-21 Thread Derek Atkins
Ariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems to me that an undo in a multi-user environment should be exactly > equal to the user deleting (or changing, etc) the transaction manually > back to what it was. As pointed out, this isn't completely true. In a multi-user environment another user may