On 03/12/2007 11:35 PM Josh Sled wrote:
...
> The weekly->daily case is unexpected, though. Would you mind isolating
> the XML for that SX and sending it over ... here or
> privately?
Is this what you are looking for?
508e34743f3f57e81b332ee866644c04
Volker Englisch
y
y
0
0
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:42 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> I have the feeling just the content without the debug options will help you:
> * 22:15:28 CRIT g_date_set_julian: assertion
> `g_date_valid_julian (j)' failed
> This also explains why - as I noticed today - a transaction scheduled
> f
On 03/12/2007 08:47 PM Josh Sled wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 18:45 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
>> It seems the transactions that are either listed to be ignored or to be
>> created are not cleared from the SLR list and are displayed again the
>> next time the SLR runs. Here it doesn't matte
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 18:45 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> It seems the transactions that are either listed to be ignored or to be
> created are not cleared from the SLR list and are displayed again the
> next time the SLR runs. Here it doesn't matter if the SLR is started
> from the menu opti
Mark Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If having this be part of GnuCash is consistent with the project's
> goals, I'd be glad to put in the work needed to merge it in.
>
> I naively assumed that python bindings would be viewed as a feeping
> creature. Feep, feep!
Well, I don't think I'd use
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 00:26 -0400, Jerry Quinn wrote:
>
> I had talked to my dad a bit about features that he would need to use gnucash
> in their business setting and audit trail was at the top of the list. With
> an
> audit trail, you really can't have an undo that is indistinguishable from
