Re: RFC - SX Projection Report ; Patch - SX enable/disable

2007-01-31 Thread Josh Sled
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 22:23 -0500, Peter McAlpine wrote: > I look forward to hearing your feedback regarding the patch and > feature proposal. The patch generally looks fine. Thanks for sticking (mostly) to the coding style convention in the existing files ... even if it's often my old, silly,

Re: about check number heuristics

2007-01-31 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 18:42 schrieb Ethy H. Brito: > > Feel free to submit the patch, even if it seems small to you. > > Ok. I couldn't make my point about my patch proposal. > > Please find bellow my small patch to deal with check numbers as long > integers. (I still think this is not the ri

Re: Compiling/linking

2007-01-31 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Quoting Andrew Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The errors I get are below. It seems like there must have been some > problem when the initial directory structure was created, as > /opt/gnucash/lib simply doesn't exist. Why would that happen? I only see one error below, and the error is that you

Re: Compiling/linking

2007-01-31 Thread Andrew Wood
Hi Derek, Thanks for the suggestion (which should work!): > cd src/backend/file > make > make install > > Viola, you're now running with the new code. > The errors I get are below. It seems like there must have been some problem when the initial directory structure was created, as /opt/gnucash/l

Re: Compiling/linking

2007-01-31 Thread Derek Atkins
cd src/backend/file make make install Viola, you're now running with the new code. (note that this only works if you ONLY change .c files. If you change header files you might need to recompile/reinstall from the top level) -derek Quoting Andrew Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > This is goi

Re: Compiling/linking

2007-01-31 Thread harold felton
howdee, if make-install made everything work the first time, then (by obviousness) you would need to make-install to put your amended-changes in too. btw - you should just TRY these things, because many things become obvious when you DO them, not when you just SAY them... (minor nitpick, sorry)

Compiling/linking

2007-01-31 Thread Andrew Wood
Hi, This is going to sound like a very dumb question, so forgive me if it seems obvious but it isn't particularly transparent. Say I've built GNUCash and installed it with 'make install'. I then change some of the code in io-gncxml-v2.c .I then run make. This will recompile that file, and I pr

Re: RFC - SX Projection Report ; Patch - SX enable/disable

2007-01-31 Thread Tim Wunder
Well, that sounds OK, but I'm not sure it would work for my usage pattern. I have about 15-20 SX's per month with variables. In order to use the report, that would seem to require a lot of data entry :( Perhaps adding the ability to assign an estimated amount in the SX editor would make using v

Re: r15474 - gnucash/trunk/src/engine/test - Do not intentionally divide by zero in test-numeric

2007-01-31 Thread Derek Atkins
Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > @@ -632,6 +635,9 @@ > gint64 nb = rand(); > gint64 ne; > > + /* avoid 0 */ > + if (nb == 0) { i--; continue; } > + > /* avoid overflow; */ > na /= 2; > nb /=

Re: dense cal font size

2007-01-31 Thread Josh Sled
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 00:01 -0500, David Reiser wrote: > I just started lurking in the irc logs. I guess I should find a > client... That'd be for those of you following along at home... > But I noticed you asked about dense calendar fo

Re: about check number heuristics

2007-01-31 Thread Dan Widyono
>123124 > 00123 00124 > A123 A124 >999 1000 > 00999 01000 > A999 A1000 > 00A123 00A124 > 00A99900A1000 >ABC ABC1 What about derek's example with a digit embedded in the static part: > >0A1C9

Re: about check number heuristics

2007-01-31 Thread Chris
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 10:23 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > > I think it just needs to skip over all non-numeric until the end; we > only need to deal with strings of the form "c*d+", where we have any > number (including zero) of leading alpha-numerics, followed by at > least one digit. Then we jus