SWIGification status, Part 2

Devs and Testers, The swig-redo branch has a swigified GnuCash. I've smoke-tested it, but it needs some more exercise. Several steps in the process were pretty manual and error-prone. Fortunately, the type of bugs I'm most likely to have introduced are very easy to fix. The whole

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > During a packaged install of a gconf-using program, you need to disable > gconf schema installation during `make install` and instead do it > manually during the packaging mechanism's 'post-install' stage. The > former is done via something like [[[ > >

Re: ANNOUNCE: GnuCash 2.0.2 and GnuCash Docs 2.0.1 Release

Bret Busby wrote: > When will it be available as a .deb package, for Debian stable? 2.0.1 is in etch now, so when etch releases, at least that will be there. 2.0.2 has been uploaded to unstable, and I expect it will make it into etch before release. Thomas __

Re: r14931 - gnucash/branches/2.0 - Add ChangeLog entries.

Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2006 14:17 schrieb Derek Atkins: >> Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Any other proposals? >> >> I propose that once we reach 2.2 we forego manual ChangeLog >> entries and just use the Subversion Log. We can

se_SV BAS2003 example account tree, help req

Last week in IRC a few of us made an effort to convert the Swedish "BAS 2003" accounts into a GnuCash example account tree. The flat text file of accounts was taken from Lazy8 Ledger [1]. The file is a fairly regular structure representing a rich account tree; an initial column provides both acco

Re: r14935 - gnucash/branches/2.0 - update to release 2.0.2

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 13:54 -0600, Chris Lyttle wrote: > Yes, I missed his email until after I was done with the release. IMHO I > would rather not see bug #'s in release announcements, if people want to > refer to a bug then they should look in the changelog. To me both the > NEWS and announcem

Re: ANNOUNCE: GnuCash 2.0.2 and GnuCash Docs 2.0.1 Release

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Norbert Klein schrieb: >> When will it be available as a .deb package, for Debian stable? >> >> The latest version apparently available for Debian stable, as a .deb >> pacakge, is 1.8.10-12 . > Any plans, when will it be available as a RPM package, for

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 23:55 +0200, Rauch Christian wrote: > mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > /opt/gnome/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule > apps_gnucash_history.schemas > Failed to load source "xml::/etc

Re: ANNOUNCE: GnuCash 2.0.2 and GnuCash Docs 2.0.1 Release

Bret Busby wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Chris Lyttle wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 14:18:06 -0600 >> From: Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: ANNOUNCE: GnuCash 2.0.2 and GnuCash Docs 2.0.1 Release >> >> >>

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > None that i know of, but this doesn't have to say anything ;) > I'll ask on opensuse-packaging if there is a (preferred?) way > to do this. This is the answer I got on opensuse-packaging from Stanislav Brabec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stanislav Brabec sc

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Stimming schrieb: > Christian: Did your rpm install ever work with 2.0.x? If yes, then the > problem obviously is due to some recent changes. But I rather suspect > this is due to the fundamental ways gconf works. Yes, it worked just fine wi

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian: Did your rpm install ever work with 2.0.x? If yes, then the problem obviously is due to some recent changes. But I rather suspect this is due to the fundamental ways gconf works. Did you read http://www.gnome.org/projects/gconf/, the sectio

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Am Mo, 9.10.2006, 11:30, schrieb Rauch Christian: > I now put the GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA right before make install, This fixed the issue and it packaged up just fine and completed successfully! Thanks for your help! Regards, Rauch Christian ___

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Am Mo, 9.10.2006, 11:08, schrieb Andreas Köhler: > Am Montag, den 09.10.2006, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: >> Am Mo, 9.10.2006, 09:43, schrieb Andreas Köhler: >> > Am Sonntag, den 08.10.2006, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: >> >> mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Am Montag, den 09.10.2006, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: > Am Mo, 9.10.2006, 09:43, schrieb Andreas Köhler: > > Am Sonntag, den 08.10.2006, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: > >> mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > >> GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml::/etc/gconf/gconf

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Am Mo, 9.10.2006, 09:43, schrieb Andreas Köhler: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 08.10.2006, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: >> >> mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults >> /opt/gnome/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-r

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Am Mo, 9.10.2006, 09:43, schrieb Andreas Köhler: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 08.10.2006, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: >> >> mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults >> GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults >> /opt/gnome/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-instal

Re: error during install with 2.0.2

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 08.10.2006, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Rauch Christian: > I'm currently trying to build the new rpms for Suse 10.0 and 10.1, > but the build for 10.0 fails near to the end with the following error: > > mkdir -p /var/tmp/gnucash-compiler/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > GCONF_CONFIG_SOU