On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:25:42PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:39:10PM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 17:58 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > Well, it helps, but it doesn't explain the error.
> > > Let me read the gettext manual and get back t
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 20:30 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Umm, there are big comments in Makefile.TAGS that say not to do this.
> One way or another, this should be made self-consistent.
>
> What's the intent?
I was having problems with it. I reverted my change.
David
__
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:20:32PM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
> # we don't need an etags.files dep here b/c you always call this after
> # re-generating etags.files if needed from the top-level Makefile.am.
> -etags: $(shell cat etags.files)
> +etags: etags.files $(shell cat etags.files)
>
Le sam 08/10/2005 à 20:43, Josh Sled a écrit :
> On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 20:39 +0200, Didier Vidal wrote:
> > > The most basic test is under the Reports menu, under Sample Reports: the
> > > 'Test Graphs.' report; all 3 graphs should display as
> > > http://asynchronous.org/tmp/graphs.png .
> > Works
Le sam 08/10/2005 à 20:43, Josh Sled a écrit :
> On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 20:39 +0200, Didier Vidal wrote:
> > > The most basic test is under the Reports menu, under Sample Reports: the
> > > 'Test Graphs.' report; all 3 graphs should display as
> > > http://asynchronous.org/tmp/graphs.png .
> > Works
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 20:39 +0200, Didier Vidal wrote:
> > The most basic test is under the Reports menu, under Sample Reports: the
> > 'Test Graphs.' report; all 3 graphs should display as
> > http://asynchronous.org/tmp/graphs.png .
> Works fine on fedora 2.
Sweet; What version of gtkhtml-3, btw
> The most basic test is under the Reports menu, under Sample Reports: the
> 'Test Graphs.' report; all 3 graphs should display as
> http://asynchronous.org/tmp/graphs.png .
Works fine on fedora 2.
Didier.
>
> ...jsled
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
g
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 10:43 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> book-keeping to do...). But I'm more than happy to check out a new
> version every couple of weeks, and use it and report back. Obviously,
> there are parts of the program that I don't use, or rarely use, but I do
One area in par
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:59:35PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:42 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> >>(Assuming budgets are in 2.0, which I don't think they should be...) I'd
> >>be fine if both FreqSpec and Recurrence are in the code a
