On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:09 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 1. People want to know why gnucash is still transitioning, three years
> after gnome 2 started out. That's the big one.
Lack of developer resources. The person who started the port disappeared
after a couple of months. I picked it
Quoting David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:49 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 9:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> I'm hoping this change is just a one-line change from "short int" to
>> QofModuleName --
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:49 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 9:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >> I'm hoping this change is just a one-line change from "short int" to
> >> QofModuleName -- right?
> >
> > static short module =
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 3:14 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Well, if there is a "random" failure we should really figure out what it is
> that's failing.
Fixed. The routine was asking for a random integer between 0 and 40 and
complaining when the value was < 1. Oops! Guess someone forgot the ra
I am a user of gnucash and a long time software developer and linux user
( since the earth cooled ). Up till now I have not be a member of the
gnucash-devel team. I have developed a check print program for my own use
with gnucash and wanted to see if there is any interest in this. You can
dow
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 9:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (Only mentioning it here because there's so much else in the next
> commit - the
> logging ID change has meant patches to C files all over the tree
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 9:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > (Only mentioning it here because there's so much else in the next
> > commit - the
> > logging ID change has meant patches to C files all over the tree,
> > probably more than 100).
>
> I'm
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:56:28PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> (Only mentioning it here because there's so much else in the next commit -
> the
> logging ID change has meant patches to C files all over the tree, probably
> more than 100).
Please make a separate commit for each logical chang
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
(Only mentioning it here because there's so much else in the next
commit - the
logging ID change has meant patches to C files all over the tree, probably
more than 100).
I'm hoping this change is just a one-line change from "short int" to
QofModuleNa
I'll be adding a test to configure.in to add -Wdeclaration-after-statement
when using gcc4.
The current tests only add it if gcc --version is in the 3. series and later
than 3.4 - it fails to pick up that 4.0 is larger than 3.4
:-)
I was testing the build and realised that it was missing on De
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 3:02 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 1:50 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >> Perhaps qof can just use the "gnome application" name? I thought
> >> gnome had some way to determine the name of the curren
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 3:06 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > A bit like QSF and qof_book_merge and indeed cashutil itself. To keep
> > things small and simple(r) I copy current sources into a new tree for
> > testing. It's much like creating a branch.
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> test-lots now runs without a segfault and all I got is this message:
> FAILURE engine-stuff test-engine-stuff.c:700 get_random_int_in_range
> failed but that doesn't cause the test to fail.
I wonder why? I also wonder why this is failing?
It's jus
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
A bit like QSF and qof_book_merge and indeed cashutil itself. To keep things
small and simple(r) I copy current sources into a new tree for testing. It's
much like creating a branch. I work with only the files I need for the
current critical area, makin
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 1:47 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > A few if(!xx) { return;} were needed and a few other tweaks.
>
> It might be better to use g_return_if_fail(xx) in this spot...
OK, I'll do that.
> I don't see why it would make it any more
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 1:50 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
Perhaps qof can just use the "gnome application" name? I thought
gnome had some way to determine the name of the current app? Can qof
use that?
Good idea - I use the automake macro PACKAGE
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 2:11 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:56 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > I want cashutil to provide this prototype because it can be modified
> > without changes to the gnucash codebase.
>
> [...]
>
> > This is how the logic is to be separated from the
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 1:50 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Perhaps qof can just use the "gnome application" name? I thought
> gnome had some way to determine the name of the current app? Can qof
> use that?
Good idea - I use the automake macro PACKAGE elsewhere. I'll do that.
--
Neil Willi
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:56 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> I want cashutil to provide this prototype because it can be modified without
> changes to the gnucash codebase.
[...]
> This is how the logic is to be separated from the UI. The checks and balances
> in the current GUI code will be reloc
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:09 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> The consequence would be that gnucash would have to get dropped from
> Debian until the gnome-2 branch can be built for Debian.
This is not unreasonable nor unexpected.
> There are some things that I have been asked; they are mean qu
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 2:08 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > gnc_set_logfile(f);
>>
>> Not done. It uses the default
>
> It'll need to be done with this change - the default was gnucash.trac
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a commit to do soon that will fix test-lots and test-period - there
> were bugs in some of the objects that didn't check that a valid pointer was
> being passed before trying to modify the object.
>
> A few if(!xx) { return;} were needed and a
There is no "latest build". The g2 release is still in progress.
You're welcome to pull it from CVS like everyone else.
-derek
Pawan Chitrakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear All,
>
> We are working on gnucash translation to Nepali and we are not been able to
> get the translated strings in
I've got a commit to do soon that will fix test-lots and test-period - there
were bugs in some of the objects that didn't check that a valid pointer was
being passed before trying to modify the object.
A few if(!xx) { return;} were needed and a few other tweaks.
I've also tweaked the output for
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 5:09 am, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> The Debian gnome maintainers are increasingly antsy about gnome-1
> maintenance. I am being forced to maintain more and more of gnome-1
> since gnucash is the last or near last important gnome-1 application
> left. I'm fighting
25 matches
Mail list logo
