David Hampton schrieb:
> On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 16:32 +0200, Michael Wahlbrink wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>yes I know the gnome2 branch is still in heavy development and 'is not
>>guaranteed to build ;-)
>>I've tried today to get it on my gentoo-box running, but the compile
>>bails out with some texinfo error
Hi Derek,
Thanks for the quick response,
Derek Atkins schrieb:
> Have you read README.cvs? You should never run configure by hand when
> building
> from CVS. You should run ./autogen.sh and pass that your configure options.
Yes for shure I've read this file, and I also used autogen.sh, otherwi
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 16:32 +0200, Michael Wahlbrink wrote:
> hi,
> yes I know the gnome2 branch is still in heavy development and 'is not
> guaranteed to build ;-)
> I've tried today to get it on my gentoo-box running, but the compile
> bails out with some texinfo errors.
Use gcc3.x, not gcc4.
D
Have you read README.cvs? You should never run configure by hand when building
from CVS. You should run ./autogen.sh and pass that your configure options.
Your build script looks like complete garbage. Run:
./autogen.sh [configure options]
make
make install
-derek
Quoting Michael Wahlb
hi,
yes I know the gnome2 branch is still in heavy development and 'is not
guaranteed to build ;-)
I've tried today to get it on my gentoo-box running, but the compile
bails out with some texinfo errors. So my question is here 1. is it a
known error with a known workaround ;-) or is there something
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I'd like to see the most amount of code reuse
> without code copying. Yes, QOF is external and eventually
> we should just use that. But I do NOT believe that we should
> rip out the core gnucash objects into their own source tree
> build.
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess that's the misunderstanding... you keep calling the
> gnome-frontend "gnucash" and all the non-gui-related stuff
> "gnucash-common", as the debian packages are that way. I just don't
> conceptualize it that way, since the source isn't and I don't us
