:) Nice! This is great stuff! I can't wait to use it. Thanks, David!
-chris
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:57 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > I'm not saying you have to
> > set the flag every time a change is made,
>
> ?? Then why the disagreement about passing the flag back from the collection
> every time a change is made ??
You don't have to set the flag each time a chan
On Friday 22 July 2005 6:35 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> So why have a book dirty flag at all?
For non-collection data (like the ENTITYREFERENCE hashtable). It's not a big
job - frankly. The burden is on the collections, where it should be.
> If you have the flag, you must
> insure it reflects th
On Friday 22 July 2005 4:53 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > :-)
>
> Nah, I don't think we're ready for it, now.. And honestly I don't want to
> lose the history if I can avoid it..
I can understand that.
> I'm sort of thinking that we should wait until after the g2->head merge and
> then we can cle
On Friday 22 July 2005 5:14 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> Really? My way. Load the function argument (1) and function address
> (2), call the is_dirty subroutine (1), load the structure offset (1),
> read the value (1), return (1). Depeneding on whether or not a stack
> frame is needed add another
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:43:39AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >> Unfortunately not. The engine cannot know that a dirty "account" (whatever
> >> that is) means a dirty Split (whatever that might be) exists somewhere.
> >> There
> >> is no relationship. The engine only knows that this instance
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 14:09 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Absolutely 100% wrong. Its called "Exit Without Saving." I need a
> > method to tell the backend to drop everything on the floor. Either that
> > or I need a global variable to pass data fro
David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Absolutely 100% wrong. Its called "Exit Without Saving." I need a
> method to tell the backend to drop everything on the floor. Either that
> or I need a global variable to pass data from point A in file 1, back
> through the gtk idle loop to point B
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> The book reports as dirty if the collections are dirty. As there are so few
> collections, it makes more sense to check each collection when asked rather
> than continuously set the book dirty flag every time another collection has
> cha
Christian Stimming wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I think this idea has been brought up several times,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
You know, sometimes I frustrate myself by googling all kinds of crap all
day, and then when I have a REAL question, I never think to do it... :D
I als
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 1:01 am, you wrote:
> > You clearly haven't understood my statements. I don't want to have to
> > run the list of collections each time I ask if the book is dirty.
> > That's too much work.
>
> It's not. At no time d
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I wonder if in g2 we should just move the qof files out of src/engine and
> > into lib/qof? Too bad we're still using CVS; with SVN it would be easy to
> > do that. ;)
>
> That would be a great idea. I don't mind doing all the cvs remove cvs add,
>
On Friday 22 July 2005 4:23 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In src/engine, some of the gnc-*.c|h and all qof*.c|h are QOF. The files
> > with
> >
> > capitals are not. Unfortunately, there are other files in src/engine
> > (like the budget) that don't fit th
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In src/engine, some of the gnc-*.c|h and all qof*.c|h are QOF. The files with
>
> capitals are not. Unfortunately, there are other files in src/engine (like
> the budget) that don't fit this pattern and there are files like kvp* and
> md5* that ARE p
On Friday 22 July 2005 3:07 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> ?!? Are we talking about the same project? Gnucash?
:-) Yes.
> Let me try to focus on the heart of the disconnect. The "offline
> backend" was just one fictional example of a case where the knowledge
> of financial relationships makes th
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What about Customers? Invoices? PriceDB Entries? SXes? Commodities?
>
> Most branches are probably shallow. If an object isn't contained by
> anthing other than the book, then it's contained by the book.
You're trying to break the QOF object
[ please trim replies. these messages are getting pretty long. thanks ]
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nope. Accounts contain a list of Splits. This is an essential part
> of an Account, and *something* needs to know about it and take
> advantage of it. Other than the GUI.
Th
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:23:33AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> So the Account can only iterate over all it's splits and the Trans can
> >> only
> >> iterate over all it's splits. Neither can identify a single split without
> >> iteration. The
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:13:55AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 2:54 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > > How do we dicover that it contains a dirty split? Either we have to
> > > > search through *every* split in the Collection, seeing if it's in our
> > > > account and is d
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So the Account can only iterate over all it's splits and the Trans can only
>> iterate over all it's splits. Neither can identify a single split without
>> iteration. The hierarchy is not symmetrical neither is does it accord with
>> the tree model
Gtk-1 does not support UTF8.
-derek
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please discuss this *always* on the mailing list, never only with
> individual developers.
>
> If you start to work on the gnucash translation, you might want to read
> the instruction from http://www.gnucash.
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At no time can the set_clean functions be public, these are reserved for the
> backends. There is no situation where the UI can be allowed to set the book
> to clean without going through a Save.
Actually that's not true. An "exit without save" might
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Note that this might be
>> challenging to do "right", because lots of input verification
>> can be.. challenging.. to do in an abstract way.
>
> Is that the bulk of the "accounting logic" that we are considering for the
> intermediate library?
?!? Are we talking about the same project? Gnucash?
Let me try to focus on the heart of the disconnect. The "offline
backend" was just one fictional example of a case where the knowledge
of financial relationships makes the difference between a reasonable
and unreasonable implementation. The
Hi Andrew,
I think this idea has been brought up several times,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
I also don't have any idea how to implement this. Maybe someone else.
However, if a particular report's default options bother you a lot, then
your easiest workaround would be to mo
On Friday 22 July 2005 2:54 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > How do we dicover that it contains a dirty split? Either we have to
> > > search through *every* split in the Collection, seeing if it's in our
> > > account and is dirty, OR, we just check our Account's "contains
> > > something dirty"
On Friday 22 July 2005 2:33 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I think it's risky to offer option 2 without some kind of fallback - what
> > if the server is actually local and the problem is a sign of something
> > more serious - the user's system has become unstable etc.? Alternatively,
> > the user
Please discuss this *always* on the mailing list, never only with
individual developers.
If you start to work on the gnucash translation, you might want to read
the instruction from http://www.gnucash.org/trans/TRANSLATION_HOWTO ,
which are also included in the source package in doc/TRANSLATIO
On Friday 22 July 2005 1:01 am, you wrote:
> You clearly haven't understood my statements. I don't want to have to
> run the list of collections each time I ask if the book is dirty.
> That's too much work.
It's not. At no time do you iterate through the entire collections to do this.
The code d
hey,
this is one of those little things that get to me as a heavy user. So I
want to throw out there.
As you know, when you pick a report, it runs for its default Options
immediately. I rarely, if ever, use the defaults. How difficult is it to
change a report so that it comes up with the opt
30 matches
Mail list logo
