Rich Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, I think I'm _finally_ beginning to grok the state machine of
> the business objects.
Heh. I always thought it was fairly straightforward. :)
> But that bit of unposting/reposting invoices bothers me. I understand
> the argument--especially w
On Wednesday, December 15, 2004, at 06:47 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Sounds about right.
The only comment I have is that I wouldn't call them invariants, or,
at least, not everything you've labeled is an invariant. As you
noticed, unposting an invoice does not maintain them all. This is not
a bu
Hi,
Rich Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to get a handle on the TaxTable/BillTerm parent/child
> relationship; with an eye towards documenting it. What follows comes
>>From scanning the code and reading src/doc/business.txt.
>
> Looking at just Invoice and TaxTable for now, it a
G'day Chris,
* Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041212 21:41]:
> What's New in GnuCash 1.8.10?
Creating an RPM on a fedora (FC2) system fails.
There is a line in rpm/gnucash.spec that reads:
%define rh_rel %(rpm -q --queryformat='%{VERSION}' redhat-release)
however this is a RedHat specific c
This compact one misses the Spanish translation update ;)
El lun, 13-12-2004 a las 10:07 +0100, Christian Stimming escribió:
> Chris: Thanks a lot for this release work. Just for information, a
> slightly more compact release announcement had been proposed here
> earlier, so I just copy this onc
I'm trying to get a handle on the TaxTable/BillTerm parent/child
relationship; with an eye towards documenting it. What follows comes
from scanning the code and reading src/doc/business.txt.
Looking at just Invoice and TaxTable for now, it appears that the
invariants for these objects should i
