On Friday 19 November 2004 2:44 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> Obviously, Linas, it's your box and hosting call, though. If you don't
> want to host it, perhaps we can alias 'wiki.gnucash.org' to some cheap
> 3rd party service provider?
I've got lots of space on a virtual server that can be aliased. One
On Friday 19 November 2004 4:57 pm, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Hmm. Except when the software on top of the web server opens new
> > vulnerabilities by evaluating it's parameters using shell tools without
> > proper value checking...
>
> I would recommend n
Derek Atkins wrote:
Are you offering to keep a FAQ up to date and current? That's the main point of
the Wiki right now -- not to provide documentation per se, but to aid in
answering FAQs about gnucash which may or may not actually belong in the docs,
but are FAQs nonetheless.
Absolutely! In fact
Quoting Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Geesh.
>
> Radical idea, how about if we just discuss topics on the mailing lists,
> and when ideas have been appropriately matured we add it to the
> documentation?
>
> You know... old school.
Are you offering to keep a FAQ up to date and current? T
Everyone wrote:
... web server ... vulnerabilities ... shell tools without
proper value checking... I would recommend not running a
> wiki based on shell tools...
... sandboxed to a single uid ... suexec...
There is still the possibility of local exploits, of course.
... needs a real database...
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Josh Sled wrote:
> Hmm. Except when the software on top of the web server opens new
> vulnerabilities by evaluating it's parameters using shell tools without
> proper value checking...
I would recommend not running a wiki based on shell tools.
How about MoinMoin?
http://so
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 09:31, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> >
> > > My #1 concern is security; that enabling a Wiki will allow a system
> > > compromise.
> >
> > A fair enough concern, but that could be an issue for any piece of
> > software. You're alrea
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 09:31, Derek Atkins wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
>
> > My #1 concern is security; that enabling a Wiki will allow a system
> > compromise.
>
> A fair enough concern, but that could be an issue for any piece of
> software. You're already running a web
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> My #1 concern is security; that enabling a Wiki will allow a system
> compromise.
A fair enough concern, but that could be an issue for any piece of
software. You're already running a web server, so a wiki on top of
that is not a completely new syste