On Jul 7, 2004, at 8:27 AM, Richard Mikulec wrote:
Dear Gnucash,
I've been testing Gnucash vs quicken and I like the results with the
exception of printing checks so I can sever my last link MS software
I'd be happy to prepare the check format for the standard quicken
voucher check: top third ch
>
> Indeed, the attachments appear empty...
>
Hmmm something must have mucked up. I will try to send them again when I get
home tonight. Sorry about the confusion.
Cheers,
Darin
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.gnucash.
Darin, et al.,
I've read the thread(s) regarding budgeting in gnucash. It
seemed that the design was sound and that things were progressing in the
right direction. I was hoping to look more closely at the status. (The
http://www.darin.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ link is dead.)
I've ch
> Sorry... Another question:
>
> The accounts with no name have:
>
>
>
> Instead of what I would expect as:
>
>
>
> I'm not an XML buff so that may be correct. If not, I'll look into
> that problem as well while I'm at it.
is valid XML; your expectations would be correct for SGML..
Dear Gnucash,
I've been testing Gnucash vs quicken and I like the results with the
exception of printing checks so I can sever my last link MS software
I'd be happy to prepare the check format for the standard quicken
voucher check: top third check, middle and bottom thirds show account
distrib
If it is semantically sensible to use g-wrap without having glib
(e.g., to wrap another library), then g-wrap should not depend on
glib or anything gnomeish. IMHO this is more important than keeping
the number of dependencies down - I find many dependencies with no
issues easier than dependencies
On Saturday 07 August 2004 4:16, blfs wrote:
> > > So what has to be done to keep the GnuCash code
> > > manually in sync with the QOF code?
> >
> > Cut-and-paste.. Manually make the changes to both sets of code.
>
> Could you please give a specific example?
Open an editor
View the file
Select an
