On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:54:34 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) wrote:
> After the long round of discussions about application development,
> and what database interfaces one should use, and what programming
> languages one should use, and etc. etc. and, more narrowly, my
> part in adding to
Bug #84707
-derek
Bernhard List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello there,
>
> First of all thanks for all the work you guys are doing.
> I run a little company in Basel, switzerland and want to use your software
> to do my bookkeeping.
> I just installed gnucash on my powerbook under OSX 10.3
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:26:51AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Gnucash 1.8.9 has been accepted into Debian. It has already built on 9
> other arches and there are no release critical bugs so should have no
> problem making it into testing in 10 days (the normal time for package
> migration).
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:32:56AM +0530, Biju Chacko was heard to remark:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 14:54:34 -0500
>
> > http://qof.sourceforge.net/why-qof.html
> > http://dwi.sourceforge.net/
>
> (www.gnue.org)
...
> up with a declaratory language for form descriptions, but nevertheless
...
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:24:13AM -0400, Havoc Pennington was heard to remark:
> Hi,
>
> Reading quickly, it seems like GNOME Storage
> (http://www.gnome.org/~seth/storage/) is thinking along similar lines,
> in particular making all documents/data richly queryable and multiuser.
> It does not ha
Hi,
Reading quickly, it seems like GNOME Storage
(http://www.gnome.org/~seth/storage/) is thinking along similar lines,
in particular making all documents/data richly queryable and multiuser.
It does not have apps go straight to SQL though, it requires the data to
follow an XML-style conceptual or
Hello there,
First of all thanks for all the work you guys are doing.
I run a little company in Basel, switzerland and want to use your software
to do my bookkeeping.
I just installed gnucash on my powerbook under OSX 10.3.3. It runs under
X11.
It runs very good. And I even have it running as a
Nope, it's only in HEAD, meaning not in the 1.8 release cycle. It'll
be in 1.10/2.0 sometime in the future.
-derek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is this MT940-thing in the new 1.8.9 release ?
>
> Rolf
>
>>-- Original-Nachricht --
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
Is this MT940-thing in the new 1.8.9 release ?
Rolf
>-- Original-Nachricht --
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:46:41 -0500
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: MT940
>
>
>Code for this is already in CVS. I dont know if/when it would get in