Alex J.P. writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Finally got the unstable version to compile and run. The initial look at the
> new register windows and the help system in one short word is WOW!!. It looks
> really good. (A few more WOWs like this and we are going to make a lot more
> waves than we are m
Hi All,
Finally got the unstable version to compile and run. The initial look at the
new register windows and the help system in one short word is WOW!!. It looks
really good. (A few more WOWs like this and we are going to make a lot more
waves than we are making now)
The XML output of the da
writes:
>
> Plan X:
> Rip out any notion of "reporting currency" out of the engine.
> As discussed above, this is a lot of work. Hard work, at that.
>
> Plan Y:
> Leave the reporting currency inside the engine, as it is today.
> Maybe even enhance it so that multiple reporting currencies
>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 05:09:38PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No. Because this returns the "wrong thing". For an ibm stock
> account, it would return IBM. Whereas both the main window, and
> the register need USD (the "reporting currency").
It's my position (call it "position B" :) tha
It's been rumoured that Christian Stimming said:
>
> But in the current implementation nothing related to accounts is called
> "reporting currency", so it is confusing to start with that now.
Yes, and part of my proposal is to change the name. To avoid future
confusion.
> Do you
> mean the
It's been rumoured that Dave Peticolas said:
> Is this what you are proposing:
>
> Account Security stays the same, with the same meaning.
Yes. except maybe we should call it "account commodity".
> Account Currency becomes Account Reported Currency and is
> the currency used in the main window.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi Bill,
While I was writing the report code for displaying the commodity (aka
currency) with the accounts balance, I realized that maybe we need a new
data type to represent that: A type which represents a gnc:numeric value
and its corresponding gnc:commodi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 14:00, you wrote:
> > I disagree with Linas in that accounts should have a
> > "reporting currency".
>
> I wasn't trying to say that they should. I was instead stating that
> that they do, in the current implementation. That's how
It's been rumoured that Christian Stimming said:
> Recall that the "reporting currency" can be changed anytime (= I agree
> with Bill on this).
As do I.
> I disagree with Linas in that accounts should have a
> "reporting currency".
I wasn't trying to say that they should. I was instead sta
OK,
This conversation has gotten to theoretical. I was trying to solve
an immediate programming problem. The SQL database stores
currencies the way we agreed they were soppused to work half a year
ago. As a practical matter, this doesn't mesh well with what the
engine currently does. So I wa
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 02:11:01AM -0800, Christian Stimming wrote:
> How can I debug reports? If scheme crashes, it used to print tons of
> useful information to stderr. But now (as opposed to the behavior in
> December) no scheme errors are printed. Did I miss a new option?
This is a bug. I'
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:42:56PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > -- The user is allowed to create transactions whose 'valuation currency'
> > >is different than the 'reporting currency'. However, if this is
> > >done, then a GUI window pops up with a question "how should this
> >
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 10:35:28PM -0800, Christian Stimming wrote:
> I repeat my question from today afternoon: Where can I find more
> information about the "price database" that you're talking about? I haven't
> found it anywhere in the source. Or what kind of database do you mean,
> Linas?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:05:28AM -0800, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Could you please explain to me your intented usage of html-table-cell ? I
> didn't understand the documentation, neither the one in report-html.txt
> nor the one in sourcecode around the function.
The idea for tables is that
Thank you.
Then why did they put frequency in? In the equation def.
frequency does not do anything. Should it? Nor for that matter
is first_Interest used either.
Phill
"John S. Dey" wrote:
The definition given is a poor one. Accrued
interest also applies to
new issues and interest is accrued d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi there,
How can I debug reports? If scheme crashes, it used to print tons of
useful information to stderr. But now (as opposed to the behavior in
December) no scheme errors are printed. Did I miss a new option?
Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
16 matches
Mail list logo
