Rob Browning writes:
> Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I agree, but I think I would miss the ability to have short account
> > names. Couldn't we let the user choose a 'Default View' that
> > performs the same function as the current hierarchy?
>
> What I had been thinking about
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." writes:
> Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> >Who uses the Perl API?
>
> I do. But I suspect that I'm one of the few. I just don't have the
> time to (re-)learn scheme. I used lisp in the 80s but these days, I
> only use it for (X)Emacs.
Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>Who uses the Perl API?
I do. But I suspect that I'm one of the few. I just don't have the
time to (re-)learn scheme. I used lisp in the 80s but these days, I
only use it for (X)Emacs.
>The reason I ask is that the Perl API is rapi
Rob Browning writes:
>
> Right now, the top level of your data is just an AccountGroup,
> identical in structure to all of it's sub-account groups. However, I
> think we need to plan (soon) to add a real top-level structure that
> can act as the "bundle" for all of the relevant, non-account, dat
Right now, the top level of your data is just an AccountGroup,
identical in structure to all of it's sub-account groups. However, I
think we need to plan (soon) to add a real top-level structure that
can act as the "bundle" for all of the relevant, non-account, data
associated with your finances
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree, but I think I would miss the ability to have short account
> names. Couldn't we let the user choose a 'Default View' that
> performs the same function as the current hierarchy?
What I had been thinking about was that by default, the official
Rob Browning writes:
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I don't really know how much flexibility we'd want to allow initially,
> > > but changing the internals at some point might make accomodating
> > > various different schemes easier.
> > >
> > I dunno if you saw t
Alexey Kakunin writes:
> I just install gnucash 1.4.8 on my debian machine and found one problem: regi
> ster use incorrect font, I need koi8-r font, but it use iso8859-1 font, so, I
> can not read my items, written in russian.
>
> How can I say gnucash to use font, I need? May be configfile, or
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Patrick Spinler wrote:
> A hint as to why: you can't balance an on-disk tree the same as an in
> memory tree. Ergo, they don't get balanced often (typically it's a
> manual operation a DBA has to do). Ergo, with a sequentially increasing
> key you quickly have a badly balan
> For example filling in a sequential primary
> key properly is a typical case, each database provides its own facility for,
> Oracle sequences, MSSQL identity columns, etc.
>
Just a note as a gainfully employed DBA:
_DO_NOT_USE_SEQUENTIALLY_INCREASING_COLUMNS_AS_PRIMARY_KEYS_
Please. Th
I just install gnucash 1.4.8 on my debian machine and found one problem: register use
incorrect font, I need koi8-r font, but it use iso8859-1 font, so, I can not read my
items, written in russian.
How can I say gnucash to use font, I need? May be configfile, or source code?
Thank you for advi
I believe that guile-1.3.4 ships w/ rh 7, so that shouldn't be a big deal
anymore.
-Peter
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 06:14:16PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
>
> Thanks for providing the RH 7.0 rpms.
>
> I had a lot of trouble trying to upgrade before -- to build gnucash I needed g-wrap.
> To build g-wrap
Hi!
I have come across something that seems to be a bug in GnuCash (latest
stable version, 1.4.8), and the problem is easy to reproduce:
- Create a new GnuCash file.
- Create a new top level account. A normal bank account will do.
- Open the new bank account in the register.
- Enter one transact
Yeah, 1.3 is a pretty lackluster guile. And that's saying something :)
-Peter
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:08:31PM +, Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote:
> Rob Browning wrote:
>
> > As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap works fine with
> > guile 1.3.4 and guile 1.4 on my system(s)
The various gnome-games packages, and maybe other parts of gnome. There
aren't many (any?) other widely-distributed packages, though.
-Peter
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:43:01PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Rob Browning writes:
> > Richard -Gilligan- Uschold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
I have a question that probably has more to do with
accounting than Gnucash itself but I figured someone probably
does the same thing on this list so...
Basically, I'm trying to keep track of the balance and the
performance of my 401k account. My account is made of SEC
registered funds so I opene
Rob Browning wrote:
Clark Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry, I'm not familiar with GLists or GSLists, but the comment
> about "'bottoms out' in Account*'s" makes me a bit nervous that it
> would only allow entries into the "leaf" accounts. There are
times
> when it is convenient to
Clark Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry, I'm not familiar with GLists or GSLists, but the comment
> about "'bottoms out' in Account*'s" makes me a bit nervous that it
> would only allow entries into the "leaf" accounts. There are times
> when it is convenient to put some entries into
Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I don't really know how much flexibility we'd want to allow initially,
> > > but changing the internals at some point might make accomodating
> > > various different schemes easier.
> > >
> > I dunno if you saw
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't really know how much flexibility we'd want to allow initially,
> > but changing the internals at some point might make accomodating
> > various different schemes easier.
> >
> I dunno if you saw the discussion I was having on the l
20 matches
Mail list logo
