Robert Graham Merkel writes:
> Guys, I received a bug report on 1.4.6 complaining that all the text
> was coming up in white, which the user fixed by modifying the reports
> to insert "text=#00" into tags. When the original HTML was
> viewed in another web
> browser, it displayed fine (I can
Robert Graham Merkel writes:
> Dave Peticolas writes:
> > Conrad Canterford writes:
> > > Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > > > > Also (another one):
> > > > Could you test this under 1.4.6?
> > >
> > > Has been fixed in 1.4.6. Guess the moral of the story is that I should
> > > keep up to date wi
On 14 Sep 2000 17:29:37 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm rewriting a tiny piece or two of the documentation, and now I'm
> looking at the stuff about reconciling your accounts
> (xacc-recnwin.sgml). I'd like to write an explanation of what the
Guys, I received a bug report on 1.4.6 complaining that all the text
was coming up in white, which the user fixed by modifying the reports
to insert "text=#00" into tags. When the original HTML was
viewed in another web
browser, it displayed fine (I can confirm this). For some reason
gtkxmh
Dave Peticolas writes:
> Conrad Canterford writes:
> > Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > > > Also (another one):
> > > Could you test this under 1.4.6?
> >
> > Has been fixed in 1.4.6. Guess the moral of the story is that I should
> > keep up to date with the latest version.
> >
> > Was the rel
I'm rewriting a tiny piece or two of the documentation, and now I'm
looking at the stuff about reconciling your accounts
(xacc-recnwin.sgml). I'd like to write an explanation of what the
letter 'c', in the reconcile window, means ... but I don't know. I
*think* it means that I've somehow ascert
Conrad Canterford writes:
> Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > > Also (another one):
> > Could you test this under 1.4.6?
>
> Has been fixed in 1.4.6. Guess the moral of the story is that I should
> keep up to date with the latest version.
>
> Was the release of 1.4.6 announced anywhere? I don't recall s
Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > Also (another one):
> Could you test this under 1.4.6?
Has been fixed in 1.4.6. Guess the moral of the story is that I should
keep up to date with the latest version.
Was the release of 1.4.6 announced anywhere? I don't recall seeing it,
and I don't read the gnucash www
> "Eric" == Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> GnuCash uses GNU Automake to handle the build process, so for most of
Eric> -the details, see the generic instructions in INSTALL. Below we detail
Eric> -the GnuCash specific bits.
Eric> +the details, see the gener
Eric Hanchrow writes:
> > "Eric" == Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The problem was that I didn't have libgdk-pixbuf, and `./configure'
> incorrectly reported that problem by saying that it couldn't find
> gtkhtml. So:
>
> * there is a bug in configure -- when libgdk-pixbuf is
> "Eric" == Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> I figured all my troubles would be over, but `configure'
Eric> still complained thusly:
Eric> checking for gtk_html_new in -lgtkhtml... no
Eric> configure: error: Cannot find gtkhtml. See the README for more
I'm trying to build GnuCash from CVS.
I couldn't get "configure" to complete, because it said (rightly) that
I didn't have the gtkhtml library. So then I looked around to see
where I could get that library from. The README file says
gtkhtml: version 0.4 and later should work. You can obtain
> "Dave" == Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> I have removed the automake and autoconf generated files from CVS.
Dave> This means 'configure' and the 'Makefile.in' files. To generate these
Dave> files, you should use the provided 'autogen.sh' script which accepts
13 matches
Mail list logo
