The transfer dialog in the latest cvs version of gnucash
allows you to enter expressions and have them evaluated.
I would appreciate any feedback you have about this mechanism,
as I eventually plan on incorporating it into every situation
in GnuCash where the user enters amounts, including the reg
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:11:49 +1000, the world broke into rejoicing as
"Phillip Shelton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So is there any validity in multiplying the number of shares I bought in
> December 1997 at $5.00 a share with the current value of $10.87 a share?
If the value is $10.87, then the
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:45:52 +1100, the world broke into rejoicing as
Conrad Canterford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> OK, here are my thoughts on why we keep an inventory of shares in
> Gnucash. Please remember that I am not an accountant, so it is entorely
> possible I'm completely off track.
>
Um, until I had shares to worry about I only had to deal with one currency.
I had a number of different accounts in that currency but as a private
individual I only worked in $AUS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher
Browne
Sent: T
On 11 Sep 2000 18:26:22 CDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Phillip Shelton writes:
> > Then maybe you can answer why you keep the _number_ of shares that you own
> > in any one company.
>
> I don't understand what you are asking.
>
> > Because the _nu
Ah! This gets back to the `When do we reconize something has happened'
problem. I did not take into account the fact that I have to record the
commission not just subsume it and thus have to have a thing to balence it
against. Obvioulsy I need to do more thinking about it. Could any of the
non-s
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:13:46 +1000, the world broke into rejoicing as
"Phillip Shelton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Umm, you lost me here. Selling shares `costs'? Don't I sell the shares for
> the going rate of $5.02 and thus make about a dollar on each share minus the
> commission and any roundi
Conrad Canterford writes:
> Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > No flaws, but one thing you might consider is implementing the
> > inventory and payroll functions largely in scheme and only loading
> > them if needed. That way, all the modules could be included in a
> > GnuCash distribution, but only loaded
Dave Peticolas wrote:
> No flaws, but one thing you might consider is implementing the
> inventory and payroll functions largely in scheme and only loading
> them if needed. That way, all the modules could be included in a
> GnuCash distribution, but only loaded when actually used, hopefully
> pre
