I was trying to reconcile a credit card account, and was trying to
enter the negative amount for the ending balence.
Unfortunately when in the reconcile window I discovered that the
ending amount was being treated as if it was positive.
After a bit of digging I figured out it was the locale conv
> Hi,
>
> I'm surprised that no one has reported this yet. I used to compile the
> CVS version just fine, then about a week ago something changed and
> now I get this.
You need to upgrade to guile-1.3.4.
dave
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm surprised that no one has reported this yet. I used to compile the
CVS version just fine, then about a week ago something changed and
now I get this.
../../src/guile/obj/gfec.o: In function `gfec_catcher':
/home/afc/archives/CVS/gnucash/src/guile/gfec.c:78: undefined reference to
`sc
Here is the RPM .spec file that I created a while ago for
the 1.2 sources. Obviously you'd have to futz with the version,
and change this to build the GNOME version
-derek
Name: gnucash
Summary: GnuCash is an application to keep track of your finances.
Version: 1.2.pre4
Release: 1
Copyright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If auto-fill as you describe was implemented, I would assume that
> would lessen the need for 'recurring transactions' i.e. automatically
> generated transactions that happen every-so-often. Would 'recurring
> transactions' still be an intersting feature to many peop
I have built gnucash from the CVS from about a week ago. It compiles
fine (make gnome), but on execution I get:
susie:~$ gnucash
It appears your 'slib' scheme library is out
of date. You need slib2c6 or later to run GnuCash.
Obtain slib at: http://swissnet.ai.mit.edu/~jaffer/SLIB.html
susie:~
Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> recurring transactions would still be nice, since when we open our
> gnucash after a week or so, the "recurring transactions" timer would
> fire, and would say, "would you like to enter your paycheck now?"
> and then it would enter a paycheck, with the
> a
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have modified startup.scm to only load this file if the check for
> slib2c6 fails, and I have tested it with both 2c4 and 2c7. It's
> kind of a hack, but it would only need to be kept around until 2c6
> or better becomes widely available.
Brillant.
Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is woody the place to go? I am still with frozen, but I would go to
> unstable again, if needed.
Well, Bill and I have (nearly) always tracked unstable on all our
machines, and we've rarely had any substantial problems, and we've
often been helped by ver
