Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Where are these functions defined, and are there corresponding
> > functions to get information about individual transactions?
>
> Yes, the C functions are in src/engine/Transaction.?
> However, getting at Transactions is not as easy, since
> there
> I'm having a look at writing some transactions reports. If I can
> produce printed transaction reports I'll be able to convert my father
> from Quicken to Gnucash!
good luck!
> I've looked at the new Scheme reporting code, and am trying to figure out
> how it works. It appears to be cal
I've just applied Dave Peticolas' bigpatch, which seems to work fine.
I'm having a look at writing some transactions reports. If I can
produce printed transaction reports I'll be able to convert my father
from Quicken to Gnucash!
I've looked at the new Scheme reporting code, and am trying to f
Mike McLendon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just started using gnuCash to keep track of my bank
> accounts and expenses. Nice program!
>
> Is there a way to change the order in which fields and buttons
> get focus in the register window? When entering data, it would
> be more convenient i
I've just started using gnuCash to keep track of my bank
accounts and expenses. Nice program!
Is there a way to change the order in which fields and buttons
get focus in the register window? When entering data, it would
be more convenient if the TAB key took you from
Date->Num->TransferFrom->De
> > > Anyway Rob, now that I have this working, can you tell me how I can
> > > get the scheme reports to pass the html to gnome as one large string?
> >
> > Well, I don't offhand about the gnome bit, but to get the output as a
> > long string instead of having it display (which I presumed we'd n
> > Anyway Rob, now that I have this working, can you tell me how I can
> > get the scheme reports to pass the html to gnome as one large string?
>
> Well, I don't offhand about the gnome bit, but to get the output as a
> long string instead of having it display (which I presumed we'd need
> to d
