Re: SQL backend

1999-11-14 Thread Greg Stark
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is thus *absolutely essential* that "GnuCash, for General Deployment," > use some form of embedded database. > > Thus, at the base level, No SQL Spoken Here, Thank You... That doesn't follow at all. SQL is an interface, you can have an SQL in

Re: SQL backend

1999-11-14 Thread Christopher Browne
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:49:40 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > It's been rumoured that Pat Spinler said: > > What functionality would be desirable for a data store ? > > > > *) high reliability > > *) crash recoverable > > *) high speed I disagr

Re: SQL backend

1999-11-14 Thread Greg Stark
Pat Spinler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't speak for Rob Coker, but I'm only talking about making a SQL > backend a "one of many" option, and probably not the default one for > all the reasons you mention. One possibility is to use a non-client-server SQL engine over a simple file forma